Skipper wrote:
wrote:

Skipper wrote:
Lloyd Sumpter wrote:

If not, I'm thinking of setting one up. Anyone wanna join?

You don't have one of the best records when it comes to getting it up.
Many of us remember your twirl with The Boats of Rec.Boats and the early
pull out.

Good work, Psuedo. Right away with the personal remarks. That should go
a long way toward resolving your expressed concern that the group is so
far OT.

IMO, the remarks WERE on topic and accurate. His bailout of the
Rec.Boats photo site was abrupt and motivated by peak. His pure
abandonment allowed a spammer to take it over to promote his commercial
site. What did you find inaccurate in my remarks?

Accurate, Shmackurate Psuedo:

Lloyd posts that he is thinking of starting a forum for the Canadian
West Coast- something that wouldn't concern your sorry bee-hind on even
a single day of the year. However, what are you then compelled to do?
What is that you simply cannot resist doing? Why, it's make a bitchy
personal remark. Surprise (not)!

One could respond to every one of your posts with a long litany of
Skipper and Psuedo Skipper faux paus and foolishness in the NG......but
why bother?
Why make bitchy personal remarks an issue that doesn't concern you
because (1) you are not a boater and (2) except for charter fishing
down in the Gulf of CA on somebody else's boat, you rarely ever
ventured off the duck ponds of KS?

And then you wail that people are taking the NG off topic. Oh and
what's the other line? "Some people don't know the difference between
having something to say and having to say something". Others don't know
the difference between a useful, on-topic contribution and a bitchy
personal remark.

wrote:

IMO, the remarks WERE on topic and accurate. His bailout on the
Rec.Boats photo site was abrupt and motivated by pique. His pure
abandonment allowed a spammer to take it over and promote his commercial
site. What did you find inaccurate in my remarks?

Accurate, Shmackurate Psuedo:

One could respond to every one of your posts with a long litany of
Skipper and Psuedo Skipper faux paus and foolishness in the NG......but
why bother? Why make bitchy personal remarks an issue that doesn't
concern you because (1) you are not a boater and (2) except for
charter fishing down in the Gulf of CA on somebody else's boat, you
rarely ever ventured off the duck ponds of KS?

Some don't know the difference between a useful, on-topic contribution
and a bitchy personal remark.

Congrats on your whiny bitchy personal remarks, Chucky. After all, this
is the prevaricating rad/lib shyster that we are getting to know so very
very well:

http://tinyurl.com/8tt8k

--
Skipper

"Skipper" wrote in message
...
wrote:

IMO, the remarks WERE on topic and accurate. His bailout on the
Rec.Boats photo site was abrupt and motivated by pique. His pure
abandonment allowed a spammer to take it over and promote his commercial
site. What did you find inaccurate in my remarks?

Accurate, Shmackurate Psuedo:

One could respond to every one of your posts with a long litany of
Skipper and Psuedo Skipper faux paus and foolishness in the NG......but
why bother? Why make bitchy personal remarks an issue that doesn't
concern you because (1) you are not a boater and (2) except for
charter fishing down in the Gulf of CA on somebody else's boat, you
rarely ever ventured off the duck ponds of KS?

Some don't know the difference between a useful, on-topic contribution
and a bitchy personal remark.

Congrats on your whiny bitchy personal remarks, Chucky. After all, this
is the prevaricating rad/lib shyster that we are getting to know so very
very well:

http://tinyurl.com/8tt8k

--
Skipper

And after all his accusations about others being you he is now spinning his
story that this Skipper *most likely is* you. Hee-hee-hee.

This month long saga between Chuckles and you has been nothing short of
hysterical. He sure has had his shorts in a knot during that entire time.

The *real* Chuck Gould has been uncovered.

*JimH* wrote:

And after all his accusations about others being you he is now
spinning his story that this Skipper *most likely is* you.
Hee-hee-hee.

This month long saga between Chuckles and you has been nothing short
of hysterical. He sure has had his shorts in a knot during that
entire time.

The *real* Chuck Gould has been uncovered.

He's doing the "uncovering" to himself. That's the thing about scumbags.
Does he expect his "non-boater" comments to go without a response?
Remember that post from someone bragging about how they sat around
drinking beers with their wives telling stories and laughing at
"skippy"?

--
Skipper

Skipper wrote:
wrote:

IMO, the remarks WERE on topic and accurate. His bailout on the
Rec.Boats photo site was abrupt and motivated by pique. His pure
abandonment allowed a spammer to take it over and promote his commercial
site. What did you find inaccurate in my remarks?

Accurate, Shmackurate Psuedo:

One could respond to every one of your posts with a long litany of
Skipper and Psuedo Skipper faux paus and foolishness in the NG......but
why bother? Why make bitchy personal remarks an issue that doesn't
concern you because (1) you are not a boater and (2) except for
charter fishing down in the Gulf of CA on somebody else's boat, you
rarely ever ventured off the duck ponds of KS?

Some don't know the difference between a useful, on-topic contribution
and a bitchy personal remark.


You know, you really are screwed up enough to be Cave Mann, Psuedo.
Masterful snipping of the post in your response. That was a
particularly favorite dirty trick of the pre-stroke Skipper.

Congrats on your whiny bitchy personal remarks, Chucky. After all, this
is the prevaricating rad/lib shyster that we are getting to know so very
very well:

http://tinyurl.com/8tt8k

--
Skipper

wrote:

Congrats on your whiny bitchy personal remarks, Chucky. After all, this
is the prevaricating rad/lib shyster that we are getting to know so very
very well:

http://tinyurl.com/8tt8k

You know, you really are screwed up enough to be Cave Mann, Psuedo.
Masterful snipping of the post in your response. That was a
particularly favorite dirty trick of the pre-stroke Skipper.

Snipping for clarity, Chucky. It did not change meaning of your
comments. Not a "dirty trick" at all.

--
Skipper

Chuck,
How do you know Skipper had a stroke?


wrote in message
oups.com...

Skipper wrote:
wrote:

IMO, the remarks WERE on topic and accurate. His bailout on the
Rec.Boats photo site was abrupt and motivated by pique. His pure
abandonment allowed a spammer to take it over and promote his
commercial
site. What did you find inaccurate in my remarks?

Accurate, Shmackurate Psuedo:

One could respond to every one of your posts with a long litany of
Skipper and Psuedo Skipper faux paus and foolishness in the NG......but
why bother? Why make bitchy personal remarks an issue that doesn't
concern you because (1) you are not a boater and (2) except for
charter fishing down in the Gulf of CA on somebody else's boat, you
rarely ever ventured off the duck ponds of KS?

Some don't know the difference between a useful, on-topic contribution
and a bitchy personal remark.


You know, you really are screwed up enough to be Cave Mann, Psuedo.
Masterful snipping of the post in your response. That was a
particularly favorite dirty trick of the pre-stroke Skipper.

Congrats on your whiny bitchy personal remarks, Chucky. After all, this
is the prevaricating rad/lib shyster that we are getting to know so very
very well:

http://tinyurl.com/8tt8k

--
Skipper

Starbucker wrote:

Chuck,
How do you know Skipper had a stroke?

It's just more of his flaming BS. What do you expect, this is the Chucky
that I know: http://tinyurl.com/8tt8k

--
Skipper

Skipper,
Since it is obvious that you are the same Skipper who graced this NG for
years, why do you think the left wing contingent want to pretend you are a
"fake" Skipper?


"Skipper" wrote in message
...
Starbucker wrote:

Chuck,
How do you know Skipper had a stroke?

It's just more of his flaming BS. What do you expect, this is the Chucky
that I know: http://tinyurl.com/8tt8k

--
Skipper

Starbucker wrote:

Skipper,
Since it is obvious that you are the same Skipper who graced this NG for
years, why do you think the left wing contingent want to pretend you are a
"fake" Skipper?

Believe we KNOW the reason why.

--
Skipper