On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:33:21 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:


You're arguing with a junk-yard dog here, Tom. She's not worth the trouble.

I'm always willing to give anyone their shots - I just demand a
certain level of civility and common sense. If it's a 20% failure
rate, then I want to know (1) how the data was developed (2) was it
all related to FICHT or were there other mechanical/electrical
problems (3) what evidence is there available that E-TEC is just FICHT
under a different guise? In short, prove it.

I have a lot of money sunk into boats and I spendt a lot of time
researching potential power sources for my repower. The problems with
OMC are not relevant to Bombardier and E-TEC - if Karen has evidence
contrary to that, then I want to see it. It's is certainly contrary
to what I have learned about the technology.

Just trying to be a gentleman about it. :)

Later,

Tom