PocoLoco wrote:
Doug. Seriously now. Are you purposely trying to imitate Kevin?

JohnH. Seriously- does this mean you have an answer on the economics
situation under discussion?

Or is this just an attempt at name calling because you actually don't
have a clue?

DSK

P Fritz wrote:
He is certainly showing how clueless he is WRT economics.



Okay, we have a new contestant- let's play 'Do You Know Diddley Squat
About Economics'

For one point, and the right to not be considered a dumb ass whacko:

What is the definition of "short term" versus "long term"?

Meanwhile, calling names is not considered an answer.
tick tock tick tock tick tock

Maybe you should ask Nobby, he seems to have not slept thru most of his
schooling.

DSK

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:50:34 -0400, DSK wrote:

PocoLoco wrote:
Doug. Seriously now. Are you purposely trying to imitate Kevin?

JohnH. Seriously- does this mean you have an answer on the economics
situation under discussion?

Or is this just an attempt at name calling because you actually don't
have a clue?

DSK

My post was prompted by *your* name calling, which you conveniently snipped.

Did I call you a name?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"DSK" wrote in message
news
Bill McKee wrote:
Not like you who ignores reality when proposing everybody get a 25% boost
in pay.


sigh

I never proposed any such thing. Why can't you right-wing whackoes pay
attention? Are you all on some kind of medication that shuts your brain
off for 23 hours a day?

What I said was that the stated ideas about the effects of increasing
wages were wrong.

So far, none of you no-math right wing nitwits has managed to answer what
I've said, and proven that you do not have so much as a freshman level
understanding of basic economics.

I have limited time to waste here, and clearly you're not getting any
better.



I blame my noble Congress for passing extreme amounts of spending bills.
Really larded up spending bills. I blame Bush vor not vetoing a bunch of
the spending bills, and sending them back to be de-porked. Either put
the blame where it belongs, on the only branch of government who can
impose spending, or give the POTUS line item veto.

Sounds to me like you are beginning to get the picture, that your beloved
angry white man Congress & President have sold you down the river.
Unfortunately the rest of us, who knew better all along, have to ride
along.

DSK


I have always been a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. You probably
have just always been stupid.

Bill McKee wrote:
I have always been a fiscal conservative and a social liberal.

That clearly explains why you so vigorouosly support a President who is
fiscally irresponsible far beyond any liberal dreamed of being, and
socially repressive.

... You probably
have just always been stupid.


yep, that must be why I understand science & economics, and you can only
answer by pretending I said something else then falling back on feeble
insults.

DSK

PocoLoco wrote:
My post was prompted by *your* name calling

Really? What name did I call you?

Did you claim to know the answer to an economics question, and then bug
out showing your ignorance?

If I call an ignoramus an ignoramus, is that an insult or the truth?

DSK

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:06:42 -0400, DSK wrote:

PocoLoco wrote:
My post was prompted by *your* name calling

Really? What name did I call you?

Did you claim to know the answer to an economics question, and then bug
out showing your ignorance?

If I call an ignoramus an ignoramus, is that an insult or the truth?

DSK

Did I say you called me a name?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

PocoLoco wrote:
Did I say you called me a name?

So you're agreeing that you're an ignoramus?

DSK

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:56:14 -0400, DSK wrote:

PocoLoco wrote:
Did I say you called me a name?

So you're agreeing that you're an ignoramus?

DSK

Are you calling names again?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

PocoLoco wrote:
Are you calling names again?

Of course not. Why would I do that? *I'm* the one with fact based
logical opinions here.


DSK