Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
it looks interesting .... I am not a fisherman but could iamgine that
just by seing the fish on the screen doesnt mean you catch them or they are stillt here by the time you get the hook down .. I see fishfinders more useful to find the fishs depth and habitat rather than the fish itself ... I heard people say these 3D / forward looking units work well, apparently commericlas use them ... but its "too easy" to catch fish .... Also consider that the actual image you will get wont look as it does on the screen ... it can be quiet a challenge to get a normal finder to read properly a 6 beam transducer may be more difficult ... Matt |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another strip-plank question - a bit long | Boat Building | |||
Propeller efficiency question (electric) | Boat Building | |||
Other choice and counterpoise question | Electronics | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | Boat Building | |||
Sunday's VHF antics.....and a question.. | Electronics |