Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dave,
My point exactly. Man can try to hold back Mother Nature, by diverting waters, building levees etc. and we can succeed for awhile, but in the long run, Mother Nature will win. For the past 30 yrs. people have been talking about NO being flooded, so no one should have been surprised when it happened. We should have had a much better evacuation plan and emergency relief plan in place. All along the Mississippi there are breaks in the levee system, causing flooding on a much greater magnitude than if we did not have the levees. "Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:57:27 -0400, "Starbuck's" wrote: Chuck, The problem is not only upstream, but all the way along the Mississippi. The area NO is built is part of the Mississippi Delta. NO and the Mississippi Delta is supposed to flood. NO would flood even if no one lived upstream of NO. wrote in message roups.com... Butch Davis wrote: Interesting that 54% of Americans polled say don't rebuild the flooded parts of NO below sea level. That makes good fiscal sense and good safety sense. Regardless of who is or is not to blame for the progress of the life saving efforts in NO, I believe everyone can agree that the effort was made incredibly more difficult by the flooding. If NO had been affected by wind rather than by flood the rescue efforts would have been vastly simplified. I agree with the majority of Americans. Lets save the Quarter and the hotels necessary to support the Quarter's tourist industry, but lets not perpetuate the gross mistake of building a major city below sea level. It would be unsafe and a horrible waste of the people's treasure. Butch I'd get busy and let the Dutch know about this new policy. They have built below sea level for almost ever. How fricking ridiculous for everybody upstream to screw up the drainage, pave over all the soil, and then tell the folks downstream they need to tear down their city because it can't withstand the flood waters that have been artificially diverted there. We all need to be responsible for our own environmental impacts, not just shove the problem downstream and tell the folks that when it gets too unbearable they need to tear down the city overwhelmed by the impacts of somebody else's selfish land use. Uh, if I am not mistaken the flood didn't come from the river, it came from the Gulf - more specifically from a "lake" that is part of the Gulf. The water certainly was not the result of too rapid of runoff from areas upriver from NO. The Gulf side levee was breached by the storm surge from the Gulf and allowed the Gulf, which is above the level of the city, to flood in. If the rest of the Mississippi were pristine the same level of flooding would have occured. Tha Other Dave Hall "The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." -- G.B. Shaw |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why Rebuild NO? | General | |||
Sikaflex -15LM applications in boat build / rebuild | Boat Building | |||
4.3lx/v6 Webber Carb rebuild kit? | General | |||
rebuild cost question | General | |||
rebuild cost question | Power Boat Racing |