On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:59:26 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


In your wet dreams, perhaps. Bush no longer has the standing to wage a war
on trumped-up evidence. For him to do *anything* Iran, that country
would have to be taking blatant, overt actions that directly threaten the
United States, and for Bush to even suggest anything like that, he'd need
hard evidence.

I'm not so sure, Harry. Who's to stop him? Surely, not our gutless
Congress. Still, I don't see it happening. Iraq is keeping our military
rather occupied, and I don't see that situation changing anytime soon.

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:59:26 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


In your wet dreams, perhaps. Bush no longer has the standing to wage a
war
on trumped-up evidence. For him to do *anything* Iran, that country
would have to be taking blatant, overt actions that directly threaten the
United States, and for Bush to even suggest anything like that, he'd need
hard evidence.

I'm not so sure, Harry. Who's to stop him? Surely, not our gutless
Congress. Still, I don't see it happening. Iraq is keeping our military
rather occupied, and I don't see that situation changing anytime soon.

Hogwash. Iran is keeping our military occupied. It just so happens that
they're doing it in Iraq.