On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:18:59 -0400, "P. Fritz"
wrote:


"Juan Valdez" wrote in message
...
Don't know if I was part of that motley crew, but I am glad you jumped on
me
for such a stupid mistake. I wish I could blame it on my spell check, it
might have been a brain fart or multi-tasking, but none the less, that is
one stupid mistake.

"Your" doing mankind a favor by jumping on me. ; )

Just about everyone makes that mistake once in awhile........there is only
one person that consistantly does it (as well as mistakingly using "you're"
when "your" is correct) and doing it when he is spell or grammar flaming
someone else.....







"Don White" wrote in message
...
Juan Valdez wrote:
Harry,
You are the one first person I heard who wanted to bomb Iraq. The
difference is you wanted to bomb the entire country into dust. The
difference is your are an idiot.

"your are an..."
Smithers..aren't you one of the motley crew who pile on another poster
here for similar mistakes?



Thanks for changing your quoted text color. Your replies are *much* easier to
find and read now.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
What is your point?

They have names, in case you didn't notice.

Yes, they do have names and faces and they should be honored for their
sacrifice and not be used as a political tool.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
What is your point?

They have names, in case you didn't notice.

Yes, they do have names and faces and they should be honored for their
sacrifice and not be used as a political tool.



I'm not running for public office, you dolt. No political tools involved.
I'm simply posting the names of the pawns murdered by your president, whose
sole purpose is to wage war for his own sexual thrills and financial gain.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in sole purpose is to wage
war for his own sexual thrills and financial gain.

Doug,
I must have missed the news about Bush's sexual thrills, do you know
something we don't?

"Juan Valdez" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in sole purpose is to
wage war for his own sexual thrills and financial gain.

Doug,
I must have missed the news about Bush's sexual thrills, do you know
something we don't?

I assume you slept through college, eh?

Doug,
Nope, did very well in school, and stayed awake in class. I just can't
imagine anyone receiving sexual gratification from the Iraqi War. Do you
get off thinking about it? I sure haven't read anything in the news about
Bush and his fantasy life, have you? What is the deal with you and Harry
and bizarre sexual fantasies


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Juan Valdez" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in sole purpose is to
wage war for his own sexual thrills and financial gain.

Doug,
I must have missed the news about Bush's sexual thrills, do you know
something we don't?

I assume you slept through college, eh?

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
What is your point?

They have names, in case you didn't notice.

Yes, they do have names and faces and they should be honored for their
sacrifice and not be used as a political tool.



I'm not running for public office, you dolt. No political tools involved.
I'm simply posting the names of the pawns murdered by your president,
whose sole purpose is to wage war for his own sexual thrills and financial
gain.

Have you ever thought of attending anger management classes? You seem to be
pretty worked up and your agenda sounds politically motivated.

When politicians make policies which have no clear, sane and well-grounded
reasons, there is a limited set of conclusions you can come to. It means
their decisions were based on bribery (politely called "pork barrel" or
"conflicts of interest"), religion, or maladjusted personal fantasies. I'll
leave you to choose which apply to Bush. I believe #3 and #2 are the
motivations he's most conscious of (and I'm being polite by linking the
concept of consciousness to Bush). #1 is most certainly the case as well,
although that's more of a motivator for his family, who propped him up for
election, for reasons you MUST be aware of without explanation.

"Juan Valdez" wrote in message
...
Doug,
Nope, did very well in school, and stayed awake in class. I just can't
imagine anyone receiving sexual gratification from the Iraqi War. Do you
get off thinking about it? I sure haven't read anything in the news
about Bush and his fantasy life, have you? What is the deal with you and
Harry and bizarre sexual fantasies


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Juan Valdez" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in sole purpose is to
wage war for his own sexual thrills and financial gain.

Doug,
I must have missed the news about Bush's sexual thrills, do you know
something we don't?

I assume you slept through college, eh?

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
What is your point?

They have names, in case you didn't notice.

Yes, they do have names and faces and they should be honored for their
sacrifice and not be used as a political tool.



I'm not running for public office, you dolt. No political tools involved.
I'm simply posting the names of the pawns murdered by your president,
whose sole purpose is to wage war for his own sexual thrills and
financial gain.

Have you ever thought of attending anger management classes? You seem to
be pretty worked up and your agenda sounds politically motivated.


No, Bertie. This is the truth, plain and simple. Your president's list of
reasons for Iraq have all turned to vapor. Nothing left but 100% personal
reasons for the war, and that qualifies as mental illness.

Doug,
Your understanding of "pork barrel" is as convoluted as the rest of your
theory. There are many other reasons that you are not able to understand,
including your very unique "sexual fantasy" concept. For what it is worth:
Pork barrel (or pork barrel politics) is a derogatory term used to describe
government spending that is intended to benefit constituents of a politician
in return for their political support, either in the form of campaign
contributions or votes. Typically it involves funding for government
programs whose economic or service benefits are concentrated but whose costs
are spread among all taxpayers. Public works projects and agricultural
subsidies are the most commonly cited examples, but they do not exhaust the
possibilities. Pork barrel spending is often allocated through last-minute
additions to appropriations bills.



"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
When politicians make policies which have no clear, sane and well-grounded
reasons, there is a limited set of conclusions you can come to. It means
their decisions were based on bribery (politely called "pork barrel" or
"conflicts of interest"), religion, or maladjusted personal fantasies.
I'll leave you to choose which apply to Bush. I believe #3 and #2 are the
motivations he's most conscious of (and I'm being polite by linking the
concept of consciousness to Bush). #1 is most certainly the case as well,
although that's more of a motivator for his family, who propped him up for
election, for reasons you MUST be aware of without explanation.

"Juan Valdez" wrote in message
...
Doug,
Nope, did very well in school, and stayed awake in class. I just can't
imagine anyone receiving sexual gratification from the Iraqi War. Do you
get off thinking about it? I sure haven't read anything in the news
about Bush and his fantasy life, have you? What is the deal with you and
Harry and bizarre sexual fantasies


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Juan Valdez" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in sole purpose is to
wage war for his own sexual thrills and financial gain.

Doug,
I must have missed the news about Bush's sexual thrills, do you know
something we don't?

I assume you slept through college, eh?