US Politics


Published: 10-Feb-2004
By: Jonathan Miller
From Channel 4 UK


The true extent of US casualties in Iraq are still unknown. This has
fuelled suspicion that the administration may be hiding the true human
cost of the war and its aftermath. Channel Four News has been allowed a
rare opportunity to meet some of America's wounded soldiers.

In a dark corner of Andrews Air Force base on the outskirts of
Washington DC, America's war-wounded come home.



The human cost of humbling tyrants.



No ceremony, no big welcome.



More than 11,000 medical evacuees have come through Andrews in the past
nine months, the Air Force says.



Most, we suspect, from Iraq. But that's 8,000 more than the Pentagon
says have been wounded there.



Most of those wounded in action come through the vast Walter Reed
Medical Center in Washington.



The American public is, for the most part, unaware that the true
casualty count of the war in Iraq may actually be higher than official
figures suggest.



The apparent discrepancy is fuelling suspicion that the US government's
got something to hide.



There'd been a suicide at the Center the previous week. Another of what
the Pentagon terms a "non-hostile" death - in other words, one that
won't figure on its list of fatalities,



We were the first foreign TV crew to film at Walter Reed Army Medical
Center since the invasion of Iraq one year ago.



One patient, Staff Sergeant Maurice Craft, had his leg blown off in
November by a roadside bomb in Baghdad. He'd gone to liberate a land
whose people turned out to be hostile. It was a nasty surprise :



"Doing that kind of operation over there, you don't really know who the
enemy is. They use cowardly tactics, women and children."



Another patient, Staff Sergeant Roy Mitchell, lost his leg in
Afghanistan three months ago:



"The ones that are covered are the KIAs. The “Killed in Action”. I'm not
taking anything away from those soldiers. They deserve that coverage.
But there is also us. To say we're forgotten, that would be going just a
little bit too far to say we're forgotten but I'd say we are the missed
soldiers of the army."



Says Sgt Craft, "A lot of people are getting hit. What they are showing
are the deaths. They are not showing this here. They have a death toll
but they're not showing the number of people being hit and being
amputated because of their injuries.



Channel 4 News: "And in you're opinion, the number of wounded in action,
the number wounded generally, is quite high?"



"Yes."



Students of modern military history could be forgiven a sense of
deja-vu. It was to Walter Reed Medical Center that America's war-wounded
from Vietnam were brought.



Numbers-wise, there's still no comparison. 58,000 Americans died in
Vietnam; fewer than 600 have been killed in Iraq. But psychologically,
Vietnam has a resonance that still shapes politics here.



Come November, President Bush, who never fought in South East Asia, may
well be up against Senator John Kerry, a decorated Vietnam vet. Could
that be why the dead and wounded return to Washington in the middle of
the night with no fanfare?



The images the US government does want us to see depict the return of
America’s heroes – such as arrival back at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, of
the 101st Airborne division after a year in Iraq.



It was to have been a six-month tour of duty. They are the survivors,
the lucky ones.



But when it comes to the wounded, an astonishing situation has arisen:
the Pentagon's figures clash wildly with those of the US Army.



The Pentagon lists 2,604 wounded in action and just 408 "non-hostile
wounded".



But the Army says many thousands more have been medically evacuated from
the conflict zone.



Why the discrepancy? Well, the Pentagon doesn't count as victims
soldiers who come back with brain injuries or psychiatric disorders,
those hit by friendly fire or those who've crashed in their military
vehicles.



You could call them "the missing wounded" of Operation Iraqi Freedom.



Some suspect the government's been deliberately massaging the figures.



According to Steve Robinson, from the National Gulf War Resource Center:



"Information warfare is a tenet of war. It's part of the strategy in war
and it's something we employ in Iraq to win to gain the hearts and minds
of the Iraqi people. And in some cases it looks as if the Department of
Defense is employing information warfare back doing this at home by not
releasing accurate information or making it difficult to obtain
information. That prevents the story from being told or it makes it take
longer for the story to be told or it frustrates people to where they
don't even try to tell the story."



Steve Robinson is no anti-war liberal. A former Special Forces soldier
with 20 years' service, he now briefs Presidents. He believes we're not
being told the full story.



"People don't want bad news stories coming out from this war and at
every level where I need information, every time I need information from
the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans' Affairs, about
the injuries of this war, I run unto obstacles. None of this is national
security. None of this will cause the collapse of the coalition. It's
just information that we need to understand what's happening."



Heath Calhoun, 24, wasn't able to walk off the plane with his brothers
from the 101st Airborne. This was how he broke the news from his
hospital bed in Mosul to his 21-year-old wife Tiffany : "I called her
and I told her she could have the good news or the bad news. I said I've
got my legs blown off, but the good news is I'm coming home."



Heath's Humvee crew was hit by a rocket propelled grenade.



"I didn't know what had happened. It hit and I saw a big burst of white
powder and than I saw white and went flying into the air. I could see my
legs were mucked up and blood coming out of them and I screamed.



He still wears the ID tag of his friend Morgan, who was blown to pieces.



Was it all worthwhile?



"I can't answer that question yet. If Iraq becomes and democracy, yes,
but if it all falls apart, I think it will be in vain. We'll have to
work that out."



This is a patriotic part of the south. Fort Campbell, headquarters of
the 101st Airborne, straddles the state line between Tennessee and
Kentucky. There is an awkwardness here when it comes to asking questions
about America's adventure in Iraq.



There's a lot to work out and there's a lot going on inside the heads of
some of these soldiers.



I went to meet some injured Iraq veterans on the base who'd formed a
support group. Not a very macho thing to do, they admitted, but they
said they needed to get stuff off their chests.



Pat Collins from New Jersey is 38. He took shrapnel though his neck in
Baghdad and is in permanent pain.



"I was injured on patrol in Baghdad. Couple guys ambushed us. I've got
nerve damage. A lot of pain. I took a lot of morphine. Readjusting.
Getting my life back on track. I'm not going to do what I did before.
Time to move on and find something else to do. I'm not going to what it
was I did before."



His anger is, in some cases, producing political transformation.



Pat: "I was a Republican ... I'm going to be incredibly active in the
Democratic Party once I get out."



And who's his democratic preference, we asked?



Pat: "Kerry."



It was at this point that we were asked to stop filming. Other members
of the group had grown uneasy that things had taken a poltical turn.



Says Terry James, a Psychiatric Counsellor : "The only other war I can
closely compare this with is Vietnam. When we went to Somalia, Bosnia,
Panama, etc. once war was declared over, it was over. But this one is
not over even though it' s declared over."



President Bush may have declared major combat operations in Iraq over
ten months ago, but fresh planeloads of wounded soldiers continue to fly
into Andrews Air Force base every week, unseen by most Americans.



If the US government was to admit to the true human cost of Operation
Iraqi Freedom, the wounded as well as the dead, then how many Americans
would support George Bush and his war?