Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
NYC XYZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Keenan & Julie wrote:


Why don't you look them up?


Figured folks like you who know so much would know at least this much.

I don't know why they were there.


So why make it an issue of why I was there, and under what
circumstances? One poster in this NG even wanted to know what I was
doing out at night!

Unless you think they deliberately tried not to see you, it is irrelevant.
They didn't see you.


How do you know the Bible is the Word of God?

Because it says so in the Bible.

Do you not see your constant circular reasoning?

Predictable is not the same as safer.


You bet your accuary degree it is! What do you think the insurance
industry gambles on? For that matter, how do you think casinos make
their money?

Your case only attests to the fact
that there was one incident where you browned your shorts.


No, reddened my shirt is what happened. But your mentality speaks to
why you paddle in circles.

They might. You seem to have an irritating quality.


Sure -- you chase your own tail and blame me for your dizziness!

I think you should take this to future president Hillary Clinton, that's in
her jurisdiction, isn't it?


Oh, sorry, thought this was rec.boats.paddle, not alt.whatever.

I'll continue learning this sport, no thanks to you, but my advice to
you is to take a course in Symbolic Logic I before the next
Presidential elections.

  #2   Report Post  
Keenan & Julie
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"NYC XYZ" wrote in message
ups.com...

Keenan & Julie wrote:


Why don't you look them up?


Figured folks like you who know so much would know at least this much.


I live in Canada. As such, I am not well versed in the rules governing
police boats in New York. Since you actually use those waters, it would make
sense for you to find out what the rules are for that jurisdiction.

I don't know why they were there.


So why make it an issue of why I was there, and under what
circumstances? One poster in this NG even wanted to know what I was
doing out at night!


I'm not everyone on this NG. I didn't have a meeting or talk to anyone else
here before responding to you. Try to focus, you are sounding paranoid.

Unless you think they deliberately tried not to see you, it is
irrelevant.
They didn't see you.


How do you know the Bible is the Word of God?

Because it says so in the Bible.

Do you not see your constant circular reasoning?


My statement is not an example of circular reasoning.

You have no evidence whatsoever that the police made a deliberate attempt to
hit you. Nor have you suggested any plausible reason why they would attempt
to do so. Thus, all logic points to the probability that they simply did not
see you.

Predictable is not the same as safer.


You bet your accuary degree it is! What do you think the insurance
industry gambles on? For that matter, how do you think casinos make
their money?


It is decidely not the same. This is illogical. Very illogical.

Just as knowing that the odds are against you at the casino does not help
you come out a winner, knowing that the roads are dangerous does not make
them safer to travel.

Your case only attests to the fact
that there was one incident where you browned your shorts.


No, reddened my shirt is what happened. But your mentality speaks to
why you paddle in circles.


yawn

They might. You seem to have an irritating quality.


Sure -- you chase your own tail and blame me for your dizziness!


yawn

I think you should take this to future president Hillary Clinton, that's
in
her jurisdiction, isn't it?


Oh, sorry, thought this was rec.boats.paddle, not alt.whatever.

I'll continue learning this sport, no thanks to you, but my advice to
you is to take a course in Symbolic Logic I before the next
Presidential elections.


Take a look at what you have written here and give some thought as to
whether or not you are in a position to hand out advice of this nature.


  #3   Report Post  
NYC XYZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Keenan & Julie wrote:


I live in Canada. As such, I am not well versed in the rules governing
police boats in New York. Since you actually use those waters, it would make
sense for you to find out what the rules are for that jurisdiction.


Wow, funny that after all the other advice you have for me, you're so
shy and humble over the one point which matters, that I'd originally
asked about!

I'm not everyone on this NG. I didn't have a meeting or talk to anyone else
here before responding to you. Try to focus, you are sounding paranoid.


I didn't say you were "everyone." Get rid of the water in your ears.

My statement is not an example of circular reasoning.


And here we have yet another example of your fine reasoning processes:
conclusion by fiat.

You have no evidence whatsoever that the police made a deliberate attempt to
hit you.


This was never an issue. Why do you insist on making it one?

Nor have you suggested any plausible reason why they would attempt
to do so.


Never an issue. Are you going to go on about WMDs next?

Thus, all logic points to the probability that they simply did not
see you.


Never an issue, said issue remaining being whether it makes any sense
to leave the middle of the river open for motorized traffic if said
motorized traffic will still just race up the shoreline anyway.

It is decidely not the same. This is illogical. Very illogical.


Sigh...like I said, go talk to your insurance company.

Just as knowing that the odds are against you at the casino does not help
you come out a winner,


No ****, Sherlock -- knowing the odds are against you "helps" you come
out a loser! Knowing the odds are with you helps you come out a
winner. You're mixing up odds for and against with what
predicatability/probability means vis-a-vis safety.

knowing that the roads are dangerous does not make
them safer to travel.


Knowing something's safer means knowing the odds FOR; knowing
something's more dangerous means knowing the odds AGAINST. But knowing
the odds for OR against is better -- because it makes for more informed
decision-making -- and thus safer, than not knowing. Hence the
relationship between safety and predicatability.

Hell's bells, but you really do have a screw loose up there.

And I say that not with malice, only exhaustion.

yawn


Sorry to have woken you up.

yawn


But don't forget your pills!

Take a look at what you have written here and give some thought as to
whether or not you are in a position to hand out advice of this nature.


OMG!!!

It's just like straight out of the Bible: guy walks up to Jesus and
asks, Teacher, why doesn't God just show Himself? And Christ looks him
straight in the eye and says that even if He did, folks still wouldn't
believe in Him.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eagle Depth Finder Transducer Problems Fred Reyes General 5 June 23rd 04 11:49 PM
sea eagle SR 12.6 mini-review Ken Stauffer General 2 August 25th 03 06:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017