"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
ups.com...

P. Fritz wrote:

Noted is how doug ran from the draft question..........only
liebrals in
congress have been calling for a draft.

Another idiotic, fact free statement from Fritz!!! Here's the truth,
Fritz, taking for account that you can comprehend anything:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.3598:

That comes up blank for me, at least in Netscape. Wanna summarize it?

It's a bill that calls for mandatory military *training* and
*education* for all males aged 18-22. There is no provision in the
bill to transfer a trainee to active duty and ship him over
seas...although there is a provision to complete the training in a
"national service program".

It's hardly a "draft".

http://tinyurl.com/c4x3f


It should be defeated on its face. Mandatory "military" training indeed,
and only for males? B.S.

The IDF has mandatory duty requirements...as does Belarus, Brazil,
Bulgaria, China, Croatia, Cypress, Egypt, Finland, Germany, Greece,
Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Singapore,
South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, Ukraine, and Venezuela.

This bill isn't calling for draftees to enter active duty. Instead, it's
calling for mandatory military training and education, so that we're
ready on a moments notice if a draft becomes necessary. I don't
necessarily support it, because I don't think it's needed at the moment.
However, as we continue to head further down this collision course we're
on with China, it might become prudent and necessary.


Would you support the idea of no exclusions for *any* reason, including
physical handicaps, college, etc?

No. All of the aforementioned countries have exceptions...as should we.

Handcuffs for parents who try to arrange exceptions, same thing that
sometimes happens if you hand a traffic cop a $20.

The cops down here require a couple hundred.