P. Fritz wrote:
"Jack Goff" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:25:13 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...


Apparently Doug equates slick public speaking with intelligence, moral
character etc.......which is why they got taken by
Clintoon............if
spekaing ability were a measure of intelligence, stutters must be
stupid.,
and we all know that is not true.

"Some of these people have been trained to disassemble. That means to
not
tell the truth". - George Bush

Sorry, Goff, but the boy not only screws up, but back up his mistakes
with
definitions. This one was on television, by the way, not in a story from
one
of the grownup news sources you like to slam.


You're not to bright, are you Doug? You were replying to a post by
Fritz, not me. A little CRS kicking in?

And it still has nothing to do with his intelligence........doug has yet
to show any proof of a link between public speaking ability and
intelligence...

Maybe doug can learn something about his failed tactics

Bush Bashing Fizzles
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Com..._25_05_MB.html



How hilarious! There's an "on-line poll" at the website you linked. I
thought it would be interersting to participate. Apparently there is a
built in "liberal alarm" depending on the nature of the answers on the
first couple of pages. To avoid getting any opinions that might skew
the desired outcome, the poll just simply shuts down about halfway
through with a blank page and a note that the remainder of the survey
is "unavailable". Is this truly a technical glitch, or are you guys so
used to screwing with the truth you can't even run a legit suvey? :-)

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:03:44 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:12:08 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:
?
I have hired a guy that is not well spoken, but is *very* intelligent,
and is one of our top performers. We have another that is not
visually pleasing, but is very effective at his job.

You're not too "well-spoken" yourself, bubba. Check the proper usage of
"that" and "who."

I'm an engineer, not a writer. I know the usage, and would have
caught it on a careful proofread. This NG is not that important.

I have a couple of simple tests for the few people I hire from time to
time and for the writers I help clients hire.

Your "test" may work for writers, but that's about it. It's no
definitive indication of anything, and gives you but a cursory glance
at their reading, speaking, and writing abilities. Again, no real
indication of actual intelligence, reasoning ability, etc.

Maybe you can dodge reality and point out another typo or grammar rule
I violated?


I only pointed it out because you made an issue about being "well-spoken."

Negative. I pointed out that one does not need to be well spoken in
order to be intelligent, or proficient at a job. You guys are the
ones that seem to be fixated on being well spoken, or not.

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:25:13 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...


Apparently Doug equates slick public speaking with intelligence, moral
character etc.......which is why they got taken by
Clintoon............if
spekaing ability were a measure of intelligence, stutters must be
stupid.,
and we all know that is not true.

"Some of these people have been trained to disassemble. That means to not
tell the truth". - George Bush

Sorry, Goff, but the boy not only screws up, but back up his mistakes with
definitions. This one was on television, by the way, not in a story from
one
of the grownup news sources you like to slam.


You're not to bright, are you Doug? You were replying to a post by
Fritz, not me. A little CRS kicking in?

Is there really much difference between you and him? :-)

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:25:13 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...


Apparently Doug equates slick public speaking with intelligence,
moral
character etc.......which is why they got taken by
Clintoon............if
spekaing ability were a measure of intelligence, stutters must be
stupid.,
and we all know that is not true.

"Some of these people have been trained to disassemble. That means to
not
tell the truth". - George Bush

Sorry, Goff, but the boy not only screws up, but back up his mistakes
with
definitions. This one was on television, by the way, not in a story
from one
of the grownup news sources you like to slam.


You're not to bright, are you Doug? You were replying to a post by
Fritz, not me. A little CRS kicking in?

And it still has nothing to do with his intelligence........doug has yet
to show any proof of a link between public speaking ability and
intelligence...

Who needs to show proof? He doesn't have the core values that impress me in
a person. Apparently, for you, none are necessary.

On 25 Jul 2005 17:53:31 -0700, " wrote:



P. Fritz wrote:
"Jack Goff" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:25:13 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...


Apparently Doug equates slick public speaking with intelligence, moral
character etc.......which is why they got taken by
Clintoon............if
spekaing ability were a measure of intelligence, stutters must be
stupid.,
and we all know that is not true.

"Some of these people have been trained to disassemble. That means to
not
tell the truth". - George Bush

Sorry, Goff, but the boy not only screws up, but back up his mistakes
with
definitions. This one was on television, by the way, not in a story from
one
of the grownup news sources you like to slam.


You're not to bright, are you Doug? You were replying to a post by
Fritz, not me. A little CRS kicking in?

And it still has nothing to do with his intelligence........doug has yet
to show any proof of a link between public speaking ability and
intelligence...

Maybe doug can learn something about his failed tactics

Bush Bashing Fizzles
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Com..._25_05_MB.html



How hilarious! There's an "on-line poll" at the website you linked. I
thought it would be interersting to participate. Apparently there is a
built in "liberal alarm" depending on the nature of the answers on the
first couple of pages. To avoid getting any opinions that might skew
the desired outcome, the poll just simply shuts down about halfway
through with a blank page and a note that the remainder of the survey
is "unavailable". Is this truly a technical glitch, or are you guys so
used to screwing with the truth you can't even run a legit suvey? :-)

Maybe you had a glitch. I answered liberally and had no problem.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"John H." wrote in message
...
On 25 Jul 2005 17:53:31 -0700, "
wrote:



P. Fritz wrote:
"Jack Goff" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:25:13 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...


Apparently Doug equates slick public speaking with intelligence,
moral
character etc.......which is why they got taken by
Clintoon............if
spekaing ability were a measure of intelligence, stutters must
be
stupid.,
and we all know that is not true.

"Some of these people have been trained to disassemble. That means
to
not
tell the truth". - George Bush

Sorry, Goff, but the boy not only screws up, but back up his
mistakes
with
definitions. This one was on television, by the way, not in a story
from
one
of the grownup news sources you like to slam.


You're not to bright, are you Doug? You were replying to a post by
Fritz, not me. A little CRS kicking in?

And it still has nothing to do with his intelligence........doug has
yet
to show any proof of a link between public speaking ability and
intelligence...

Maybe doug can learn something about his failed tactics

Bush Bashing Fizzles
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Com..._25_05_MB.html



How hilarious! There's an "on-line poll" at the website you linked. I
thought it would be interersting to participate. Apparently there is a
built in "liberal alarm" depending on the nature of the answers on the
first couple of pages. To avoid getting any opinions that might skew
the desired outcome, the poll just simply shuts down about halfway
through with a blank page and a note that the remainder of the survey
is "unavailable". Is this truly a technical glitch, or are you guys so
used to screwing with the truth you can't even run a legit suvey? :-)

Maybe you had a glitch. I answered liberally and had no problem.

Poor chuckie see conspiracy in anything outside of his liebral viewpoint.



--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Mr. R. Name wrote:
Harry,
Are you ashamed of yourself for
making up these stories?

Smithers, are you ashamed of yourself for being so gnat-like bothersome
that you need to change your usenet handle every five minutes so
everyone won't have you killfiled?

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
wrote:

Mr. R. Name wrote:
Harry,
Are you ashamed of yourself for
making up these stories?

Smithers, are you ashamed of yourself for being so gnat-like bothersome
that you need to change your usenet handle every five minutes so
everyone won't have you killfiled?


Bingo.

Harry lost his individual.net accout due to abuse of this newsgroup. What an
idiot. hahahahahahaha

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
HarryKrause wrote:
Doug Kanter wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
wrote:
Mr. R. Name wrote:
Harry,
Are you ashamed of yourself for
making up these stories?
Smithers, are you ashamed of yourself for being so gnat-like
bothersome
that you need to change your usenet handle every five minutes so
everyone won't have you killfiled?

Bingo.

Harry lost his individual.net accout due to abuse of this newsgroup.
What an idiot. hahahahahahaha



Does anyone really believe this idiot is Doug Kanter?


Kinda writes and behaves like...Netsock.

Don't be sore about losing your account krause, afterall you WERE WARNED
FIRST!

aaeeeaaaahahahahahahahaha

HarryKrause wrote:

usual Smither clone wrote..
Harry lost his individual.net accout due to abuse of this newsgroup.
What an idiot. hahahahahahaha



Does anyone really believe this idiot is Doug Kanter?

I think the only ones fooled are the Smithers brothers and their
hanger-ons. What a motley crew.