"John H." wrote in message
...
On 25 Jul 2005 17:53:31 -0700, "
wrote:



P. Fritz wrote:
"Jack Goff" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:25:13 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...


Apparently Doug equates slick public speaking with intelligence,
moral
character etc.......which is why they got taken by
Clintoon............if
spekaing ability were a measure of intelligence, stutters must
be
stupid.,
and we all know that is not true.

"Some of these people have been trained to disassemble. That means
to
not
tell the truth". - George Bush

Sorry, Goff, but the boy not only screws up, but back up his
mistakes
with
definitions. This one was on television, by the way, not in a story
from
one
of the grownup news sources you like to slam.


You're not to bright, are you Doug? You were replying to a post by
Fritz, not me. A little CRS kicking in?

And it still has nothing to do with his intelligence........doug has
yet
to show any proof of a link between public speaking ability and
intelligence...

Maybe doug can learn something about his failed tactics

Bush Bashing Fizzles
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Com..._25_05_MB.html



How hilarious! There's an "on-line poll" at the website you linked. I
thought it would be interersting to participate. Apparently there is a
built in "liberal alarm" depending on the nature of the answers on the
first couple of pages. To avoid getting any opinions that might skew
the desired outcome, the poll just simply shuts down about halfway
through with a blank page and a note that the remainder of the survey
is "unavailable". Is this truly a technical glitch, or are you guys so
used to screwing with the truth you can't even run a legit suvey? :-)

Maybe you had a glitch. I answered liberally and had no problem.

Poor chuckie see conspiracy in anything outside of his liebral viewpoint.



--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD