"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Curtis CCR wrote:

HarryKrause wrote:
NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Luskin has said he has been told by
the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, that Rove is not a target of the
investigation.
Rove "isn't a target of the investigation", and yet the Democrats and
liberal press are jumping all over him. Would you like to bet that the
critics have egg on their collective faces once this investigation
unfolds
completely?

Bush promised to "take appropriate action" if any member of his
administration was found involved in the matter.

I am looking at the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle which has
pulled out several past quotes from Bush administration and put them
under the headline: "ROVE UNDER FIRE"

"If there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it
is... If the person has violated the law, that person will be taken
care of." President Bush - 2/10/2004

"Involved" doesn't mean criminal activity.

Why hasn't Rove been fired?



There have been other statements from the White House that call for firing
without the mention of illegality.

Unless Rove is paid as an independent consultant, we'd have to finance his
unemployment insurance. Better to keep him on the payroll where he's at
least a little more visible.