Because it doesn't matter WHO has violated the law. Your boy will do nothing
about it. It was just another one of his "Bring 'em on!" things.


John H. wrote:
My boy? Hell, I'd have voted him out in a minute if the Democrats had put anyone
decent on the ticket!

Really? Like who, Al Sharpton?

Face facts, you are one of the lead singers in the "Bush/Cheney Uber
Alles" choir. It's funny that you try to pretend otherwise.


I'm sorry. I didn't realize you could see the future and *know* that "...my boy
will do nothing about [violations of the law]"


That's like saying the sun will rise in the east tomorrow.

DSK

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:05:18 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Now don't ask me who pulls *his* strings, because I'm fully aware that
*all* investigations in Washington are a case of the fox guarding the hen
house.


Speaking of strings, I heard this quote. " Bush firing Rove would be like
Charlie McCarthy firing Edgar Bergen." Cheap shot, but I thought it
rather funny.

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:15:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:55:28 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:57:58 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:49:38 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"Curtis CCR" wrote in message
ooglegroups.com...


I am looking at the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle which
has
pulled out several past quotes from Bush administration and put them
under the headline: "ROVE UNDER FIRE"

"If there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it
is... If the person has violated the law, that person will be taken
care of." President Bush - 2/10/2004


********
I wish we knew how many of his staff heard him say that and thought to
themselves "Aw jeez....who let him say that?"
*********


What law did Rove violate?

See the paragraph above, highlighted with asterisks? How does your
question
relate to that paragraph?


He said, "...if the person has violated the law..."

Your paragraph asked, "...who let him say that?"

What bearing does his having said that have to do with KR, who has not
been
shown to have violated a law?

Because it doesn't matter WHO has violated the law. Your boy will do
nothing
about it. It was just another one of his "Bring 'em on!" things. And, if
it
was Rove, your boy is powerless to do ANYTHING about it. Removing Rove
would
be like taking the motor out of a washing machine. Nothing left but an
empty
shell.


My boy? Hell, I'd have voted him out in a minute if the Democrats had put
anyone
decent on the ticket!

I'm sorry. I didn't realize you could see the future and *know* that
"...my boy
will do nothing about [violations of the law]"

Good! At least you are now using the word 'if'. I've accomplished my
mission for
today.

You'll see: Even if Rove is found guilty, he won't get the penalty he
should, which, if I'm correct, is life in prison. It's considered espionage,
isn't it?


"If is for children, if is for children, building daydreams."

Roger Whitaker



--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:15:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:55:28 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:57:58 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
news:t0v7d1l3b5d4g1j64ncg7e5tj0rjt929b8@4ax. com...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:49:38 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"Curtis CCR" wrote in message
news:1121183163.924334.288800@g49g2000cwa. googlegroups.com...


I am looking at the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle
which
has
pulled out several past quotes from Bush administration and put
them
under the headline: "ROVE UNDER FIRE"

"If there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who
it
is... If the person has violated the law, that person will be
taken
care of." President Bush - 2/10/2004


********
I wish we knew how many of his staff heard him say that and thought
to
themselves "Aw jeez....who let him say that?"
*********


What law did Rove violate?

See the paragraph above, highlighted with asterisks? How does your
question
relate to that paragraph?


He said, "...if the person has violated the law..."

Your paragraph asked, "...who let him say that?"

What bearing does his having said that have to do with KR, who has not
been
shown to have violated a law?

Because it doesn't matter WHO has violated the law. Your boy will do
nothing
about it. It was just another one of his "Bring 'em on!" things. And, if
it
was Rove, your boy is powerless to do ANYTHING about it. Removing Rove
would
be like taking the motor out of a washing machine. Nothing left but an
empty
shell.


My boy? Hell, I'd have voted him out in a minute if the Democrats had
put
anyone
decent on the ticket!

I'm sorry. I didn't realize you could see the future and *know* that
"...my boy
will do nothing about [violations of the law]"

Good! At least you are now using the word 'if'. I've accomplished my
mission for
today.

You'll see: Even if Rove is found guilty, he won't get the penalty he
should, which, if I'm correct, is life in prison. It's considered
espionage,
isn't it?


"If is for children, if is for children, building daydreams."

Roger Whitaker

I know, John. It's dinner time soon. No time for a proper answer.Or thought.

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:18:11 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:15:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:55:28 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:57:58 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
news:t0v7d1l3b5d4g1j64ncg7e5tj0rjt929b8@4ax .com...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:49:38 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"Curtis CCR" wrote in message
news:1121183163.924334.288800@g49g2000cwa .googlegroups.com...


I am looking at the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle
which
has
pulled out several past quotes from Bush administration and put
them
under the headline: "ROVE UNDER FIRE"

"If there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who
it
is... If the person has violated the law, that person will be
taken
care of." President Bush - 2/10/2004


********
I wish we knew how many of his staff heard him say that and thought
to
themselves "Aw jeez....who let him say that?"
*********


What law did Rove violate?

See the paragraph above, highlighted with asterisks? How does your
question
relate to that paragraph?


He said, "...if the person has violated the law..."

Your paragraph asked, "...who let him say that?"

What bearing does his having said that have to do with KR, who has not
been
shown to have violated a law?

Because it doesn't matter WHO has violated the law. Your boy will do
nothing
about it. It was just another one of his "Bring 'em on!" things. And, if
it
was Rove, your boy is powerless to do ANYTHING about it. Removing Rove
would
be like taking the motor out of a washing machine. Nothing left but an
empty
shell.


My boy? Hell, I'd have voted him out in a minute if the Democrats had
put
anyone
decent on the ticket!

I'm sorry. I didn't realize you could see the future and *know* that
"...my boy
will do nothing about [violations of the law]"

Good! At least you are now using the word 'if'. I've accomplished my
mission for
today.

You'll see: Even if Rove is found guilty, he won't get the penalty he
should, which, if I'm correct, is life in prison. It's considered
espionage,
isn't it?


"If is for children, if is for children, building daydreams."

Roger Whitaker

I know, John. It's dinner time soon. No time for a proper answer.Or thought.


Thank goodness there was little need for thought to give you a proper answer.

Yes, gotta go cook. Tonight chicken fried steak with cream gravy, corn on the
cob, and brown rice. Gonna get high on the carbs!

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:22:34 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:18:11 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:15:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:55:28 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:57:58 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:49:38 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"Curtis CCR" wrote in message
oups.com...

I am looking at the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle
which
has
pulled out several past quotes from Bush administration and put
them
under the headline: "ROVE UNDER FIRE"

"If there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who
it
is... If the person has violated the law, that person will be
taken
care of." President Bush - 2/10/2004
********
I wish we knew how many of his staff heard him say that and thought
to
themselves "Aw jeez....who let him say that?"
*********

What law did Rove violate?
See the paragraph above, highlighted with asterisks? How does your
question
relate to that paragraph?

He said, "...if the person has violated the law..."

Your paragraph asked, "...who let him say that?"

What bearing does his having said that have to do with KR, who has not
been
shown to have violated a law?
Because it doesn't matter WHO has violated the law. Your boy will do
nothing
about it. It was just another one of his "Bring 'em on!" things. And, if
it
was Rove, your boy is powerless to do ANYTHING about it. Removing Rove
would
be like taking the motor out of a washing machine. Nothing left but an
empty
shell.

My boy? Hell, I'd have voted him out in a minute if the Democrats had
put
anyone
decent on the ticket!

I'm sorry. I didn't realize you could see the future and *know* that
"...my boy
will do nothing about [violations of the law]"

Good! At least you are now using the word 'if'. I've accomplished my
mission for
today.
You'll see: Even if Rove is found guilty, he won't get the penalty he
should, which, if I'm correct, is life in prison. It's considered
espionage,
isn't it?

"If is for children, if is for children, building daydreams."

Roger Whitaker
I know, John. It's dinner time soon. No time for a proper answer.Or thought.


Thank goodness there was little need for thought to give you a proper answer.

Yes, gotta go cook. Tonight chicken fried steak with cream gravy, corn on the
cob, and brown rice. Gonna get high on the carbs!



Starch-r-us. Why corn and rice?

Afraid the corn would go bad.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:26:09 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:22:34 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:18:11 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:15:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:55:28 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:57:58 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:49:38 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"Curtis CCR" wrote in message
oups.com...

I am looking at the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle
which
has
pulled out several past quotes from Bush administration and put
them
under the headline: "ROVE UNDER FIRE"

"If there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who
it
is... If the person has violated the law, that person will be
taken
care of." President Bush - 2/10/2004
********
I wish we knew how many of his staff heard him say that and thought
to
themselves "Aw jeez....who let him say that?"
*********

What law did Rove violate?
See the paragraph above, highlighted with asterisks? How does your
question
relate to that paragraph?

He said, "...if the person has violated the law..."

Your paragraph asked, "...who let him say that?"

What bearing does his having said that have to do with KR, who has not
been
shown to have violated a law?
Because it doesn't matter WHO has violated the law. Your boy will do
nothing
about it. It was just another one of his "Bring 'em on!" things. And, if
it
was Rove, your boy is powerless to do ANYTHING about it. Removing Rove
would
be like taking the motor out of a washing machine. Nothing left but an
empty
shell.

My boy? Hell, I'd have voted him out in a minute if the Democrats had
put
anyone
decent on the ticket!

I'm sorry. I didn't realize you could see the future and *know* that
"...my boy
will do nothing about [violations of the law]"

Good! At least you are now using the word 'if'. I've accomplished my
mission for
today.
You'll see: Even if Rove is found guilty, he won't get the penalty he
should, which, if I'm correct, is life in prison. It's considered
espionage,
isn't it?

"If is for children, if is for children, building daydreams."

Roger Whitaker
I know, John. It's dinner time soon. No time for a proper answer.Or thought.

Thank goodness there was little need for thought to give you a proper answer.

Yes, gotta go cook. Tonight chicken fried steak with cream gravy, corn on the
cob, and brown rice. Gonna get high on the carbs!


Starch-r-us. Why corn and rice?

Afraid the corn would go bad.

Makes perfect sense. You use a rice cooker?

Nope, kettle with a lid. Two and a half cups water (or combination with a can of
chicken broth), bring to boil, add one cup brown rice (Mahatma is fine). Cover,
turn down to simmer for 45 mins. DO NOT PEAK!

If it's not done (all the water gone), turn stove up a little more next time. If
it stuck to the bottom, turn it down a little next time.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

Makes perfect sense. You use a rice cooker?

Harry, what the phuque is a rice cooker????

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

Makes perfect sense. You use a rice cooker?

Harry, what the phuque is a rice cooker????

A kitchen electrical pot in which you place measured amounts of rice and
water. It steams the rice until it is perfectly cooked. Mine is about the
size of a two quart pot, and it has a glass cover. They're inexpensive.
They're also called "rice steamers."

Here's one:

http://importfood.com/ricecooker.html


Some oriental families I know have very large and somehow boxlike rice
cookers. Chinese restaurants also use the bigger units.

I thought a pot with a lid did just fine for the past 30 years. I guess I
was wrong. :-)

Just another one of Bush's Lies, He said he would FIRE who ever leak the
information, ok now it turns out to be one of his friends and he has NOTHING
to say. We already know he lied to the American people about the Iraq war
and now this proves you cant beleive what he says.
wrote in message
ups.com...
Rove under fire
White House won't answer questions on new evidence in leak
Richard W. Stevenson, New York Times

Tuesday, July 12, 2005


Printable Version
Email This Article




Washington -- Nearly two years after stating that any administration
official found to have been involved in leaking the name of an
undercover CIA officer would be fired, and assuring that Karl Rove and
other senior aides to President Bush had nothing to do with the
disclosure, the White House refused on Monday to answer any questions
about new evidence of Rove's role in the matter.

With the White House silent, Democrats rushed in, demanding that the
administration provide a full account of any involvement by Rove, one
of the president's closest advisers, turning up the political heat in
the long- simmering case and leaving some Republicans worried about the
possible effects on Bush's second-term agenda.

Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic minority leader, cited Bush's
past statements about firing anyone involved in the leak and said, "I
trust they will follow through on this pledge."

Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., and a private group, Citizens for
Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, called on Bush to suspend
Rove's security clearances, shutting him out of classified meetings.

And Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said it is
"disturbing that this high-ranking Bush adviser is not only still
working in the White House, but now has a significant role in setting
our national security policy."

In two contentious news briefings, the White House press secretary,
Scott McClellan, would not directly address any of a barrage of
questions about Rove's involvement, a day after new evidence surfaced
suggesting that Rove had discussed the CIA officer with a reporter from
Time magazine in July 2003 without identifying her by name.

Under often hostile questioning, McClellan repeatedly declined to say
whether he stood behind his previous statements that Rove had played no
role in the matter, saying he could not comment while a criminal
investigation was under way.

He brushed aside questions about whether the president would follow
through on his pledge, reiterated just over a year ago, to fire anyone
in his administration found to have played a role in disclosing the
officer's identity. And he declined to say when Bush learned that Rove
had mentioned the CIA officer in his conversation with Time magazine
reporter Matthew Cooper.

No comment

Rove made no public comment. A senior administration official, who
spoke on the condition of anonymity because the White House now says
its position is not to comment on the case while it is under
investigation by a federal special prosecutor, said Rove had gone about
his business as usual Monday.

The criminal investigation into how the CIA officer's name came to
appear in a syndicated newspaper column two years ago continued largely
out of public view. But the disclosure in recent days of evidence that
Rove had discussed the CIA officer's identity, albeit in a vague way,
thrust the case squarely back into the political arena, reflecting
Rove's standing as among the most powerful men in Washington and his
place in the innermost councils of the White House.

Because of the powerful role Rove plays in shaping policy and deploying
Bush's political support and machinery throughout the party, few
Republicans were willing to discuss his situation on the record. Asked
for comment on Monday, several Republican senators said they did not
know enough or did not want to venture an opinion.

Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman, merely responded to
the comments by his counterpart, Dean, by saying: "It's disappointing
that once again, so many Democratic leaders are taking their political
cues from the far left. ...The bottom line is the Democrats are engaged
in blatant partisan political attacks."

Rove, Bush's senior adviser, deputy chief of staff and political
strategist, was plunged into the center of the matter Sunday, when
Newsweek reported that an e-mail written by a Time magazine reporter
had recounted a conversation with Rove in July 2003 in which Rove had
discussed the CIA operative at the heart of the case without naming
her.

Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, has said the e-mail showed that Rove was
not taking part in any organized effort to disclose the identity of the
operative, Valerie Plame Wilson, the wife of Joseph Wilson. Wilson is a
former diplomat who traveled to Africa on behalf of the CIA before the
Iraq war to investigate reports concerning Saddam Hussein's efforts to
acquire nuclear material.

In July 2003, several months after Hussein was toppled, Wilson publicly
disputed one of the administration's claims about the Iraqi nuclear
program. He has suggested that the White House sought retribution by
publicly identifying his wife, first in a syndicated column written by
Robert Novak, effectively ending her career as a covert operative.

Flat denial

In the fall of 2003, McClellan said flatly that Rove had not been
involved in disclosing Plame's name. Asked about the issue on Sept. 29,
2003, McClellan said he had spoken with Karl Rove, and that it was not
true that Rove had a role in the disclosure of her identity.

Two weeks earlier, he had called suggestions that Rove had been
involved ridiculous. On Oct. 10, 2003, after the Justice Department
opened its formal investigation, he said Rove, national security aide
Elliot Abrams and I. Lewis Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of
staff, had nothing to do with the leak.

McClellan and Bush have both made clear that the White House would
consider leaking Plame's identity a firing offense. Bush was asked
about that position most recently a little over a year ago, when he was
asked whether he stood by his pledge to fire anyone found to have
leaked the officer's name. "Yes," he replied, June 10, 2004.

Under some circumstances, it can be against the law to disclose the
identity of a covert CIA operative. Luskin has said he has been told by
the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, that Rove is not a target of the
investigation.