wrote in message
oups.com...


John H. wrote:

What law did Rove violate?

--
John H.

Section 421 of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act:



You are a lawyer now Kevin? Amazing.

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


John H. wrote:

What law did Rove violate?

--
John H.

Section 421 of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act:



You are a lawyer now Kevin? Amazing.


No, stupid. He's one of the select few whose reading comprehension abilities
fall into the category of "adult". We'll let you hang around the group if
you like, but your duties will be limited to parking cars and licking boots.

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:54:34 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:37:00 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

Doug Kanter wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

Makes perfect sense. You use a rice cooker?
Harry, what the phuque is a rice cooker????
A kitchen electrical pot in which you place measured amounts of rice
and
water. It steams the rice until it is perfectly cooked. Mine is about
the
size of a two quart pot, and it has a glass cover. They're inexpensive.
They're also called "rice steamers."

Here's one:

http://importfood.com/ricecooker.html


Some oriental families I know have very large and somehow boxlike rice
cookers. Chinese restaurants also use the bigger units.

I thought a pot with a lid did just fine for the past 30 years. I guess
I
was wrong. :-)




You was wrong.

Actually, I use ours mostly when I am cooking a bunch of stuff at the
same time in four or five pots and the oven. As you know, you have to
keep an eye on rice to cook it properly, and the rice cooker not only
keeps its eye on the rice, as it were, but it also frees up a cooktop
burner.

Please show me something that says to keep an eye on rice to cook it
properly.
If you've been raising the lid to look, no wonder a 'rice cooker' is your
method
of choice.

For once, I have to agree with John. Perhaps some people have issues with
measuring cups, or getting used to a particular stove. There are only 3
variables: Quantities, time and heat. Harry...tune into Emeril Live now and
then. :-)


Crap. If you're agreeing with me, I must be doing something wrong. : )

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:26:47 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

Doug Kanter wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
P. Fritz wrote:

So, Fritz...when your wife dumped you, was it because of your excessive
drinking or your physical abuse of her?

Hey....stay on track. Respond to my brutal rice accusations, or be in
contempt of court. Saving stovetop space is a valid point, but cooking rice
properly? Now you're pushing it, Harry. :-)

You've never overcooked rice and had it turn out dry or even burned
while watching other pots on the stove? I have, but no more. I don't use
Minute Rice.

Most Chinese restaurants and most Japanese restaurants use rice cookers.
They are good for more than just ordinary rice. Do you make homemade
sushi? I do. With a rice cooker, you can make "sticky rice" properly so
you can form it into the shapes you want for your sushi.

I heard Fritz was divorced because, among other things, he burned
cooking bag rice.

Sticky rice comes out fine in a pot with a lid.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:31:02 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
P. Fritz wrote:

So, Fritz...when your wife dumped you, was it because of your excessive
drinking or your physical abuse of her?

Hey....stay on track. Respond to my brutal rice accusations, or be in
contempt of court. Saving stovetop space is a valid point, but cooking
rice properly? Now you're pushing it, Harry. :-)

You've never overcooked rice and had it turn out dry or even burned while
watching other pots on the stove? I have, but no more. I don't use Minute
Rice.

I have 3 wind up timers. :-) You are in contempt of court. Bailiff, whack
this man's pee-pee.


One watch and a good mind work as well as three timers, unless the dog pees on
the floor while you're cooking.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On 13 Jul 2005 13:34:09 -0700, wrote:



John H. wrote:

What law did Rove violate?

--
John H.

Section 421 of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act:



FACT -- ROVE IDENTIFIED THE AGENT AND KNEW THAT WHAT HE WAS DOING WAS
WRONG: A number of factors weigh against Rove's assertion. First, Rove
identified Valerie Plame as "Wilson's wife." Under section 421 of the
Intelligence Identities Protection Act the disclosure of "any
information identifying [a] covert agent" is illegal. Second, Rove's
lawyer is undermining the distinction between naming and identifying
Plame as too legalistic and a minor detail. Third, Rove insisted on
speaking to Cooper only on "double super secret background." As Andrew
Sullivan notes, "Why would Rove have insisted on such a super-tight
confidentiality standard if he was not aware that he was divulging
something he truly shouldn't divulge?" Fourth, as Joe Wilson himself
has indicated, his wife goes by Mrs. Wilson, so it would have been
clear who Rove was talking about (and Rove attended the same church as
the Wilson family, indicating he may know more about Plame than he's
letting on

Conjecture.

What tripe.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:41:07 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


John H. wrote:

What law did Rove violate?

--
John H.

Section 421 of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act:



You are a lawyer now Kevin? Amazing.


No, stupid. He's one of the select few whose reading comprehension abilities
fall into the category of "adult". We'll let you hang around the group if
you like, but your duties will be limited to parking cars and licking boots.


Is this one of Kevin's more 'adult' moments?

"Awe.....how cute. Was you jacking off about it, Jim?"



--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:41:07 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


John H. wrote:

What law did Rove violate?

--
John H.

Section 421 of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act:



You are a lawyer now Kevin? Amazing.


No, stupid. He's one of the select few whose reading comprehension
abilities
fall into the category of "adult".

I guess that rules you out. So all that is left on *your* side of the fence
is Kevin Noble.

You must be awful proud Dougy.

Living in an area of almost an Asian majority, you see lots of rice cookers
for sale in the stores. I do not eat that much rice, and do not want to
waste more counter space. And I have no problem cooking rice in a pan.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:26:47 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

Doug Kanter wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
P. Fritz wrote:

So, Fritz...when your wife dumped you, was it because of your excessive
drinking or your physical abuse of her?

Hey....stay on track. Respond to my brutal rice accusations, or be in
contempt of court. Saving stovetop space is a valid point, but cooking
rice
properly? Now you're pushing it, Harry. :-)

You've never overcooked rice and had it turn out dry or even burned
while watching other pots on the stove? I have, but no more. I don't use
Minute Rice.

Most Chinese restaurants and most Japanese restaurants use rice cookers.
They are good for more than just ordinary rice. Do you make homemade
sushi? I do. With a rice cooker, you can make "sticky rice" properly so
you can form it into the shapes you want for your sushi.

I heard Fritz was divorced because, among other things, he burned
cooking bag rice.

Sticky rice comes out fine in a pot with a lid.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 04:03:02 GMT, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

Living in an area of almost an Asian majority, you see lots of rice cookers
for sale in the stores. I do not eat that much rice, and do not want to
waste more counter space. And I have no problem cooking rice in a pan.

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:26:47 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

Doug Kanter wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
P. Fritz wrote:

So, Fritz...when your wife dumped you, was it because of your excessive
drinking or your physical abuse of her?

Hey....stay on track. Respond to my brutal rice accusations, or be in
contempt of court. Saving stovetop space is a valid point, but cooking
rice
properly? Now you're pushing it, Harry. :-)

You've never overcooked rice and had it turn out dry or even burned
while watching other pots on the stove? I have, but no more. I don't use
Minute Rice.

Most Chinese restaurants and most Japanese restaurants use rice cookers.
They are good for more than just ordinary rice. Do you make homemade
sushi? I do. With a rice cooker, you can make "sticky rice" properly so
you can form it into the shapes you want for your sushi.

I heard Fritz was divorced because, among other things, he burned
cooking bag rice.

Sticky rice comes out fine in a pot with a lid.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


You're a great American, Bill!

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD