| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... "DSK" wrote in message ... Rove "isn't a target of the investigation", and yet the Democrats and liberal press are jumping all over him. Would you like to bet that the critics have egg on their collective faces once this investigation unfolds completely? How many years has it taken so far? Wanna bet the next 3 1/2 years fly by with not conclusion? You're a funny guy, you know? Who do you think decides who's a target? The prosecutor. Now don't ask me who pulls *his* strings, because I'm fully aware that *all* investigations in Washington are a case of the fox guarding the hen house. Maybe President Bush's declaration that he'd get to the bottom of this was just as feeble as his declaration that he'd get Osama Bin Laden. It's really no different from Jamie Gorelick sitting on a committee investigating 9/11 failures (and cover-ups a la Sandy Berger). She drafted the damn memo that had us handling terrorism as a domestic criminal act rather than an international act of war. Doug Kanter wrote: Just wanted to make sure that in your own head, you weren't living in a fairy tale (again). :-) Oh, he's still living in a fairy tale... notice how it's the Dems fault that Rove is possibly under suspicion in a case the Bush declared a horrible crime that he'd pursue no matter who it was? Notice how NOBBY retreated to insisting that Clinton was worse (blow job! evil!)? I never mentioned Clinton by name. Not today. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Ex-oil lobbyist quits White House job | General | |||
| ( OT ) The White House Fakes It | General | |||
| ( OT ) "Jeff Gannon's" incredible access | General | |||
| DESIGNING PORTAL CREATION DATABASE SHOPPING CART ANIMAT | General | |||
Threaded Mode
