Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.


"Paul Fritz" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
I had Civil Engineering I and II in my ME program. It followed

Statics
and
Design.


Out of curiosity.....where you in a 'college of enginneering' majoring

in
mechanical, or were you in a 'college of mechanical engineering'?....


BSME Purdue University 1993. It was the "Schools of Engineering" Mechanical
Engineering degree. In April of this year, they renamed the "Schools of
Engineering" the "Colleges of Engineering". Purdue also offered a
"Mechanical Engineering Technology" (MET) degree...but I believe it was
offered by the Schools of Technology.

Here's a link of the program I attended:
http://tools.ecn.purdue.edu/ME/Undergrad/index283.whtml

The CE classes I took were technical electives. I had a difficult time
visualizing the concepts of fluid mechanics and heat and mass transfer. I
preferred things that I could visualize a little bit easier...like Statics,
Dynamics, and Structural Design.




  #2   Report Post  
P.Fritz
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.


"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"Paul Fritz" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
I had Civil Engineering I and II in my ME program. It followed

Statics
and
Design.


Out of curiosity.....where you in a 'college of enginneering' majoring

in
mechanical, or were you in a 'college of mechanical engineering'?....


BSME Purdue University 1993. It was the "Schools of Engineering"

Mechanical
Engineering degree. In April of this year, they renamed the "Schools of
Engineering" the "Colleges of Engineering". Purdue also offered a
"Mechanical Engineering Technology" (MET) degree...but I believe it was
offered by the Schools of Technology.


So you did get a 'real' mechanical engineering degree. :-)


Here's a link of the program I attended:
http://tools.ecn.purdue.edu/ME/Undergrad/index283.whtml

The CE classes I took were technical electives. I had a difficult time
visualizing the concepts of fluid mechanics and heat and mass transfer. I
preferred things that I could visualize a little bit easier...like

Statics,
Dynamics, and Structural Design.


So the CE classes where not required.

I had the difficult time with Eng. Calculus and quantum physics.....two
area I never had and will never have a need for. :-)







  #3   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.


"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"Paul Fritz" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
I had Civil Engineering I and II in my ME program. It followed

Statics
and
Design.

Out of curiosity.....where you in a 'college of enginneering'

majoring
in
mechanical, or were you in a 'college of mechanical engineering'?....


BSME Purdue University 1993. It was the "Schools of Engineering"

Mechanical
Engineering degree. In April of this year, they renamed the "Schools of
Engineering" the "Colleges of Engineering". Purdue also offered a
"Mechanical Engineering Technology" (MET) degree...but I believe it was
offered by the Schools of Technology.


So you did get a 'real' mechanical engineering degree. :-)


I lived with an MET guy. He'd always ask "how do you guys remember off the
top of your head that g=9.806 m/s^2"?

Answer: Uh, 'cause we used it about a gazillion times in our calculations
each day.

The MET guys knew the hands-on stuff better however.


Here's a link of the program I attended:
http://tools.ecn.purdue.edu/ME/Undergrad/index283.whtml

The CE classes I took were technical electives. I had a difficult time
visualizing the concepts of fluid mechanics and heat and mass transfer.

I
preferred things that I could visualize a little bit easier...like

Statics,
Dynamics, and Structural Design.


So the CE classes where not required.

I had the difficult time with Eng. Calculus


Especially Calc. II. I believe that covered Fourier transforms?

and quantum physics.....two
area I never had and will never have a need for. :-)


I agree once again. Things I could visualize, I did well in. Things that
required plugging and chugging variables into the 3rd derivative of an
equation made no sense to me.



  #4   Report Post  
P.Fritz
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.


"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"Paul Fritz" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
I had Civil Engineering I and II in my ME program. It followed
Statics
and
Design.

Out of curiosity.....where you in a 'college of enginneering'

majoring
in
mechanical, or were you in a 'college of mechanical

engineering'?....

BSME Purdue University 1993. It was the "Schools of Engineering"

Mechanical
Engineering degree. In April of this year, they renamed the "Schools

of
Engineering" the "Colleges of Engineering". Purdue also offered a
"Mechanical Engineering Technology" (MET) degree...but I believe it

was
offered by the Schools of Technology.


So you did get a 'real' mechanical engineering degree. :-)


I lived with an MET guy. He'd always ask "how do you guys remember off

the
top of your head that g=9.806 m/s^2"?

Answer: Uh, 'cause we used it about a gazillion times in our calculations
each day.

The MET guys knew the hands-on stuff better however.


What I meant was Getting a BSME as opposed to a BE majoring in mechanical
:-)



Here's a link of the program I attended:
http://tools.ecn.purdue.edu/ME/Undergrad/index283.whtml

The CE classes I took were technical electives. I had a difficult

time
visualizing the concepts of fluid mechanics and heat and mass

transfer.
I
preferred things that I could visualize a little bit easier...like

Statics,
Dynamics, and Structural Design.


So the CE classes where not required.

I had the difficult time with Eng. Calculus


Especially Calc. II. I believe that covered Fourier transforms?


It was a few (well many) years back..........diffy qs went right by
me.......but I was more concerned about my design studios


and quantum physics.....two
area I never had and will never have a need for. :-)


I agree once again. Things I could visualize, I did well in. Things that
required plugging and chugging variables into the 3rd derivative of an
equation made no sense to me.





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT - FLIP-FLOPPING MAY HAVE INJURED KERRY’S SHOULDER Henry Blackmoore General 3 April 7th 04 10:03 PM
( OT ) Creepier than Nixon -- Worse than Watergate Jim General 7 April 2nd 04 08:12 PM
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. NOYB General 23 February 6th 04 04:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017