Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NOYB" wrote
In undergrad, I majored in Mechanical Engineering, with a minor in economics. Now *that's* funny. Nobby, did any of your engineering profs tell you that the laws of physics can be trumped by faith & ideology? No wonder you became a dentist, I would be afraid to drive over any bridge you built. DSK |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"basskisser" wrote in message
om... And numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring because algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue. What proof of this wild allegation do you have? He thinks the president runs every single aspect of the government. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Kanter wrote:
He thinks the president runs every single aspect of the government. Actually, that's one of my problems with the whole Bush Administration and their fans... they seem to have trouble distinguishing between a President (or Vice President) and a dictator. DSK |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, the original plan came about in the late 1980's.....
But the plan was sidetracked by a new direction of planting a bomb under one tower to get it to fall into the other... But then again, I really can't expect you to know history that well, you seem to be one that likes to make history up as you go. "NOYB" wrote in message news ![]() wrote in message ink.net... Were picked for a "very secret mission" There is nothing here that said the mission had been planned, there is nothing that says where this happened, unless of course you follow history back and find that Atta was supposed to be living in Hamburg at that time. Granted, it might have been thought of, but planned, I doubt. You're nuts. In 1996, they discussed using planes as weapons. In 1999, they recruited the terrorists and sent them to flight school. What do you suppose that was for? In case al Qaeda got it's hands on some F-16's and decided to form an air force? The plan was set in the late 90's. It was carried out just 2 years after Atta, et al, were recruited. They didn't disclose the final details of the plan to the hijackers until Feb. 2001. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message news:_abqc.12958 Without it, we'd probably still be in a deep recession. This based upon your liberal arts studies of economics? In undergrad, I majored in Mechanical Engineering, with a minor in economics. I guess not of it really *hit home* then, did it? "not of it really hit home"? It appears that I retained more from Econ than you did from English. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote In undergrad, I majored in Mechanical Engineering, with a minor in economics. Now *that's* funny. Nobby, did any of your engineering profs tell you that the laws of physics can be trumped by faith & ideology? No wonder you became a dentist, I would be afraid to drive over any bridge you built. I still build bridges, but it'd be impossible to drive across any of 'em. |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message news:jd7qc.12789 Gore could have been President during all of this? YES, and we will never know how well (or poorly) he might have done. I can't imagine what he could do worse I can. By all measures, we experienced a *very* short-lived recession thanks to the Bush tax cut. Without it, we'd probably still be in a deep recession. Additionally, the Taliban would still control Afghanistan. They pretty much still are, and as soon as we leave, they will be in full charge again, so just what have we accomplished there? Saddam would still be in charge of Iraq. So what? Did you HONESTLY, before Bush lied us into Iraq, think about Iraqi citizens being abused? Nope. I thought about Saddam waging his own private war against the US using terrorist mercenaries. And were those thoughts of how we could releive the suffering of those citizens? Nope. I really didn't care...and still don't. If so, then why now do you make statements like we should nuke them all? See my answers above. France, Russia and China would still be selling banned weapons to Iraq. Have a problem with governments selling weapons to Iraq? Did you have the same concerns when the United States (Rumsfield) did the same? No. At that time, Saddam wasn't teaming up with terrorist organizations to secretly wage war against the US. UN officials would still be skimming billions off the oil-for-food program. Only difference is, now it's US that's doing that, by way of "private contractors", and Bush/Cheney are profiting. Bush/Cheney are profiting? How so? al Qaeda would be stronger than ever, and probably control the oil coming from the Middle East. How do you know that al Qaeda "would be stronger than ever" and "control the oil coming from the Middle East"? Because algore would have given in to bin Laden's demands after 9/11...and left the Middle East. And numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring because algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue. What proof of this wild allegation do you have? Al Gore would have just continued with the Reno Justice Dept. method of combatting terrorism. Arrest the surviving suicide bombers. |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim" wrote in message news ![]() "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "Jim" wrote in message ... Consider that from the time he was elected to Arkansas, the Republicans set out to get him. He is the most investigated president in History (possibly the most investigated US citizen). Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent investigating him, his wife, and others in his administration; yet all the could pin on him is a blow job (which BTW is NOT considered having sex in D.C.) IN SPITE of all the distractions, he let the nation to prosperity, Not 1 soldier he sent into battle failed to return (before someone hollers Somalia, I'll remind you that Bush the first sent the military there). Probably more millionaires were created during his 2 terms than any other, we were on good terms with most of the world. Now as to the "accomplishments" of Bush The US homeland was attack -- our defense was laughable -- not one plane in the air to defend the pentagon, in spite of over a hours warning. He promised to get those responsible, but hasn't. The economy is in the tank Joblessness is up He has alienated most of the civilized world Ordered 700+ of our sons and daughters to their death. Untold numbers have been wounded. We are mired in a conflict that seems unresolovable unless we admit defeat and pull out He has inspired fanatic suicide bombers to kill Americans whenever possible His administration is the most secretive in my memory. -- Allegations of Big Business involvement are everywhere His VP, and daddy are still connected with business that profits from war (Halliburton and the Carlyle Group ) There are numerous connections between the Bush family and the Saudi's Bush Jr., is an embarrassment every time he speaks to the public because of his lack of proper english What could be worse??? Gore could have been President during all of this? YES, and we will never know how well (or poorly) he might have done. I can't imagine what he could do worse A cry-baby might have done better? GIVE ME A BREAK! Thank Clinton/Gore for REFUSING to go after terrorists after the numerous attacks during their regime. Blame CLINTON for the economy since it takes a minimum of 2 years to effect the economy and the downward spiral started while Clinton was in power. And what about all the murders of those who were going to testify against the Clintons? What about the shame they brought to the US throughout the world by their criminal activities. What about deliberately lying to Congress, UNDER OATH! What about their refusal to prosecute sex offenders, actually DEFENDING child molesters? What about the Democrat's refusal to control spending? What about the Democrat's support of terrorists and refusal to supply the military with what is necessary for our troop's survival and effectiveness? Maybe you would rather have Kerry, who called the US troops fighting in Vietnam war criminals? Would he have the guts to go after terrorists? NOT ON YOUR LIFE! He SUPPORTS terrorists! -- Mike D. www.stopassaultnow.org Remove .spamnot to respond by email --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.682 / Virus Database: 444 - Release Date: 5/11/2004 |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "DSK" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote In undergrad, I majored in Mechanical Engineering, with a minor in economics. Now *that's* funny. Nobby, did any of your engineering profs tell you that the laws of physics can be trumped by faith & ideology? No wonder you became a dentist, I would be afraid to drive over any bridge you built. I still build bridges, but it'd be impossible to drive across any of 'em. I'd would not want to deive across any bridge designed by a mechanical engineer. :-) But then I would not want a podiatrist to perform brain surgery either. |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Dobony" wrote in message
... A cry-baby might have done better? GIVE ME A BREAK! Thank Clinton/Gore for REFUSING to go after terrorists after the numerous attacks during their regime. Blame CLINTON for the economy since it takes a minimum of 2 years to effect the economy and the downward spiral started while Clinton was in power. And what about all the murders of those who were going to testify against the Clintons? What about the shame they brought to the US throughout the world by their criminal activities. What about deliberately lying to Congress, UNDER OATH! What about their refusal to prosecute sex offenders, actually DEFENDING child molesters? What about the Democrat's refusal to control spending? What about the Democrat's support of terrorists and refusal to supply the military with what is necessary for our troop's survival and effectiveness? Maybe you would rather have Kerry, who called the US troops fighting in Vietnam war criminals? Would he have the guts to go after terrorists? NOT ON YOUR LIFE! He SUPPORTS terrorists! -- Mike D. www.stopassaultnow.org I wish I could find the link which describes numerous occasions at the White House when the Clintons would tell the Secret Service guys to get lost while they barbecued children they'd kidnapped in local parks. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT - FLIP-FLOPPING MAY HAVE INJURED KERRY’S SHOULDER | General | |||
( OT ) Creepier than Nixon -- Worse than Watergate | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General |