"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
NOYB wrote:
In February, 2003, Powell said that al Zaqarwi was an al Qaeda agent
operating in northeastern Iraq.

You mean, in the Kurd controlled area? How long are you going to keep
shooting yourself in the foot with this one?

Actually, since most of the Sept 11th terrorists were Saudis, and the
Bush family as well as the Bush/Cheney administration are great pals
with the Saudis; + the fact that this guy al Zaqarwi was in Kurd
territory and not only did Bush buddy up to the Kurds but he angered our
long standing & staunch allies the Turks by doing so... that looks to me
like there is a better case to be made that Bush has ties to Al Queda
than that Saddam did.


Perhaps in *your* screwed up mind...


... We now know that is true, as he's the one
currently organizing the attacks against US and Iraqi troops. Powell
also
mentioned something about WMD's, didn't he? Seems he was right about
that
one as well.

Yes, I distinctly remember him saying to the U.N. that the Iraqis had an
shell full of sarin...


That shell is the tip of the iceberg.

Please provide the following information:

1) Wednesday's winning Lotto numbers for NY.
2) The number of fish I will catch this evening, and what species.
3) Which of your patients will be in a car accident within the next 6
months.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
NOYB wrote:
In February, 2003, Powell said that al Zaqarwi was an al Qaeda agent
operating in northeastern Iraq.

You mean, in the Kurd controlled area? How long are you going to keep
shooting yourself in the foot with this one?

Actually, since most of the Sept 11th terrorists were Saudis, and the
Bush family as well as the Bush/Cheney administration are great pals
with the Saudis; + the fact that this guy al Zaqarwi was in Kurd
territory and not only did Bush buddy up to the Kurds but he angered
our
long standing & staunch allies the Turks by doing so... that looks to
me
like there is a better case to be made that Bush has ties to Al Queda
than that Saddam did.


Perhaps in *your* screwed up mind...


... We now know that is true, as he's the one
currently organizing the attacks against US and Iraqi troops.
Powell
also
mentioned something about WMD's, didn't he? Seems he was right
about
that
one as well.

Yes, I distinctly remember him saying to the U.N. that the Iraqis had
an
shell full of sarin...


That shell is the tip of the iceberg.

Please provide the following information:

1) Wednesday's winning Lotto numbers for NY.
2) The number of fish I will catch this evening, and what species.
3) Which of your patients will be in a car accident within the next 6
months.

Number 3 would be easy. When they're deaf and near-blind, and their cars
look like they're fresh off the set of Mad Max, it's a sure bet that they'll
be in an accident withing the next 6 months. Number 2 would be easy as
well: you'll catch no fish tonight. Number 1 is purely random, so there's
no way to accurately predict it.

Number 4, "Finding the WMD", is a sure thing however.

Sorry Noyb... You appear to be wrong again

http://www.wtkr.com/global/story.asp?s=1873574
Rumsfeld says it wasn't necessarily sarin

Washington-AP -- Don't jump to any conclusions just yet. That warning comes
from Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, after the U-S military in Iraq
announced that a roadside bomb containing sarin nerve gas had exploded near
a U-S military convoy.

Rumsfeld told a Washington, D-C audience that the "field test" showing the
presence of sarin may not be accurate. He says more analysis needs to be
done -- and that it may take some time to find out just what the chemical
was.

In Baghdad, officials said the bomb was apparently left over from the Saddam
era. They said two members of a military bomb squad were treated for "minor
exposure" -- but that there were no serious injuries.

One official says the shell apparently contained two chemicals that are
designed to combine and create sarin -- but that they didn't mix properly.

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
NOYB wrote:
In February, 2003, Powell said that al Zaqarwi was an al Qaeda
agent
operating in northeastern Iraq.

You mean, in the Kurd controlled area? How long are you going to
keep
shooting yourself in the foot with this one?

Actually, since most of the Sept 11th terrorists were Saudis, and
the
Bush family as well as the Bush/Cheney administration are great pals
with the Saudis; + the fact that this guy al Zaqarwi was in Kurd
territory and not only did Bush buddy up to the Kurds but he angered
our
long standing & staunch allies the Turks by doing so... that looks
to
me
like there is a better case to be made that Bush has ties to Al
Queda
than that Saddam did.


Perhaps in *your* screwed up mind...


... We now know that is true, as he's the one
currently organizing the attacks against US and Iraqi troops.
Powell
also
mentioned something about WMD's, didn't he? Seems he was right
about
that
one as well.

Yes, I distinctly remember him saying to the U.N. that the Iraqis
had
an
shell full of sarin...


That shell is the tip of the iceberg.

Please provide the following information:

1) Wednesday's winning Lotto numbers for NY.
2) The number of fish I will catch this evening, and what species.
3) Which of your patients will be in a car accident within the next 6
months.

Number 3 would be easy. When they're deaf and near-blind, and their cars
look like they're fresh off the set of Mad Max, it's a sure bet that
they'll
be in an accident withing the next 6 months. Number 2 would be easy as
well: you'll catch no fish tonight. Number 1 is purely random, so
there's
no way to accurately predict it.

Number 4, "Finding the WMD", is a sure thing however.