Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:23:02 GMT, Red CloudŽ
wrote: On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:03:54 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:00:01 GMT, Red CloudŽ wrote: On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:06:46 -0400, DSK wrote: "Traffic separation schemes have the same legal force as ColRegs, but they are usually for approaching busy ports, or transiting waters thick with commercial traffic (like say, the English Channel fr'instance). In a narrow inland channel, no such anny-mull." Ah, I see. I should have repeated the phrase "Traffic Seperation" just to make sure that it was clear I meant that, not ColRegs. What's the difference between traffic separation, and traffic seperation? They sound so similar. Separation is down bound and seperation is up bound. Damn - I thought everybody knew that. I guess it's time for me to hit the books for a se/arious review! Yes - and don't forget to use a dictionary. Or a spell checker. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another strip-plank question - a bit long | Boat Building | |||
Propeller efficiency question (electric) | Boat Building | |||
Other choice and counterpoise question | Electronics | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | Boat Building | |||
Sunday's VHF antics.....and a question.. | Electronics |