On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:23:02 GMT, Red CloudŽ
wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:03:54 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:00:01 GMT, Red CloudŽ
wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:06:46 -0400, DSK wrote:
"Traffic separation schemes have the same legal force as ColRegs, but
they are usually for approaching busy ports, or transiting waters
thick with commercial traffic (like say, the English Channel
fr'instance). In a narrow inland channel, no such anny-mull."
Ah, I see. I should have repeated the phrase "Traffic Seperation" just
to make sure that it was clear I meant that, not ColRegs.
What's the difference between traffic separation, and traffic seperation? They
sound so similar.
Separation is down bound and seperation is up bound.
Damn - I thought everybody knew that.
I guess it's time for me to hit the books for a se/arious review!
Yes - and don't forget to use a dictionary.
Or a spell checker.
|