Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... And I knew you guys would be a little shocked to learn that it was the liberal Supreme Court justices who supported it! ********** How many of the mega-huge private development corporations that will *benefit* from the ruling are likely run by "liberals"? The issue isn't whether the ruling was voted for by liberal or conservative justices, the issue is that the government now says its OK for a private developer to pressure local politicians to boot you out of your home or business, and that doing so is OK if the politician can make a case that the private developer's use of your land would be better for the "public good." But for the sake of 4 liberal justices and 1 conservative justice the *issue* would be moot. So it *is* about how these justices voted. This is consistent with the erosion of rights in all areas of society during the last several years. Condeming private property for the purpose of awarding it to another private owner is pure BS regardless of the political bent of he justices that supported it. Glad to hear you say that, even though 4 of the 5 are liberal justices who apparently want to rewrite the Constitution and take all our rights away from us. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "*JimH*" wrote in message news ![]() wrote in message oups.com... And I knew you guys would be a little shocked to learn that it was the liberal Supreme Court justices who supported it! ********** How many of the mega-huge private development corporations that will *benefit* from the ruling are likely run by "liberals"? The issue isn't whether the ruling was voted for by liberal or conservative justices, the issue is that the government now says its OK for a private developer to pressure local politicians to boot you out of your home or business, and that doing so is OK if the politician can make a case that the private developer's use of your land would be better for the "public good." But for the sake of 4 liberal justices and 1 conservative justice the *issue* would be moot. So it *is* about how these justices voted. This is consistent with the erosion of rights in all areas of society during the last several years. Condeming private property for the purpose of awarding it to another private owner is pure BS regardless of the political bent of he justices that supported it. Glad to hear you say that, even though 4 of the 5 are liberal justices who apparently want to rewrite the Constitution and take all our rights away from us. MSNBC poll has people voting 98% opposed to the ruling, and 2% supporting it. The political party that jumps on this ruling first can sure stand to gain a lot in the next election. I think I'll send an email to Karl Rove. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() *JimH* wrote: Glad to hear you say that, even though 4 of the 5 are liberal justices who apparently want to rewrite the Constitution and take all our rights away from us. The biggest liar and hypocrite in rec.boats has spoken. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: Glad to hear you say that, even though 4 of the 5 are liberal justices who apparently want to rewrite the Constitution and take all our rights away from us. The biggest liar and hypocrite in rec.boats has spoken. The village idiot has spoken. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: Glad to hear you say that, even though 4 of the 5 are liberal justices who apparently want to rewrite the Constitution and take all our rights away from us. The biggest liar and hypocrite in rec.boats has spoken. The village idiot has spoken. Awe, how cute... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ps.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: Glad to hear you say that, even though 4 of the 5 are liberal justices who apparently want to rewrite the Constitution and take all our rights away from us. The biggest liar and hypocrite in rec.boats has spoken. The village idiot has spoken. Awe, how cute... Actually the saying is "*Aw*, how cute". Idiot. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ps.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: Glad to hear you say that, even though 4 of the 5 are liberal justices who apparently want to rewrite the Constitution and take all our rights away from us. The biggest liar and hypocrite in rec.boats has spoken. The village idiot has spoken. Awe, how cute... Actually the saying is "*Aw*, how cute". Idiot. That's quite nice, Jim. Let's see, you, in another thread read something someone wrote about DECALS, and your addled brain somehow read that as PLACARDS, yet you have the audacity to call someone else an idiot....priceless. But, you're still a hypocrite and a liar, which makes you not credible, so coming from you, it means nothing. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Nice job screwing up a perfectly fine thread Kevin. BTW: Didn't you reprimand another member here for doing exactly what you did in this thread? Idiot. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
StarBoard Projects and Fabrication Techniques | Cruising | |||
used sail material needed for scout projects | Boat Building | |||
Charles Wing Boatowners Wiring Manual Projects | Electronics | |||
Stevenson Projects Micro-Cup | Boat Building | |||
Winter Boat Projects...who's got some? | General |