"*JimH*" wrote in message
news

wrote in message
oups.com...
And I knew you guys would be a little shocked to learn that it was the
liberal Supreme Court justices who supported it!


**********

How many of the mega-huge private development corporations that will
*benefit* from the ruling
are likely run by "liberals"?

The issue isn't whether the ruling was voted for by liberal or
conservative justices, the issue is that the government now says its OK
for a private developer to pressure local politicians to boot you out
of your home or business, and that doing so is OK if the politician can
make a case that the private developer's use of your land would be
better for the "public good."

But for the sake of 4 liberal justices and 1 conservative justice the
*issue* would be moot. So it *is* about how these justices voted.


This is consistent with the erosion of rights in all areas of society
during the last several years.

Condeming private property for the purpose of awarding it to another
private owner is pure BS regardless of the political bent of he
justices that supported it.

Glad to hear you say that, even though 4 of the 5 are liberal justices who
apparently want to rewrite the Constitution and take all our rights away
from us.

MSNBC poll has people voting 98% opposed to the ruling, and 2% supporting
it.

The political party that jumps on this ruling first can sure stand to gain a
lot in the next election.

I think I'll send an email to Karl Rove.