"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Good heavens!

Could it be that the current government thinks that individual
liberties, personal and property rights, and even constitutional rights
like due process can and should be suppressed in favor of the "public
good"?


Could it be that 4 of the 5 justices who supported this opinion are
liberals who supported Gore in in 2000?

Could it be that liberals don't believe in private property, and the
rights of the individual? Of course, that's what happens in a
socialistic society...so this ruling makes sense considering who voted
for it.





Could it be that private developers who own enough politicians (or
select politicians) can pressure the government to condemn your house,
land, or business and turn the property over to their development
cartel so they can put up a shopping mall or build some condos? That's
awful. We should look into this, and repudiate any politicians so
blatantly pro-business.

Thanks for posting this. I always suspected you were a patriot. :-)



And thanks for falling into my trap. ;-)

I knew I could count on the lefties on the forum to be the first ones
condemning the ruling.

And I knew you guys would be a little shocked to learn that it was the
liberal Supreme Court justices who supported it!




The vote was 5-4. The liberals do not have a 5-4 majority.

Kennedy jumped ship and joined the rest of the rats.

Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas, and O'Conner dissented.