About Us

in article , Scott Weiser at
wrote on 6/23/05 7:39 PM:

A Usenet persona calling itself KMAN wrote:

in article , Scott Weiser at
wrote on 6/23/05 5:58 PM:

A Usenet persona calling itself KMAN wrote:

in article , Scott Weiser at
wrote on 6/22/05 9:06 PM:

A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote:

Scotts figures:
=============
Voluntary insurance is fine. Compulsory insurance is not, including
compulsory "liability" insurance we have to carry on our vehicles.
==============

WRONG!

I need to know that when you put me out of action through an automobile
accident, that you'll have enough insurance to cover my loss of income
and sundry other expenses.

Why do you "need" to know this? What makes you believe that you have some
inherent right to know this, or to demand that I have anything at all by
way
of insurance? Can you state any principle in the Constitution that gives
you
this "right" to demand such things of me? I think not.

There's nothing in the Constitution that specifically states that Scott
Weiser has the right to be an idiot, and yet, you persist.

Takes one to know one...

Actually, it doesn't. EVERYONE knows you are an idiot.

Are you having an MPD moment? Since you're not "everyone," you must be, and
even if "everyone" believed as you suggest, that would not change the truth
of my statement.

OK, I stand to be corrected.

Anyone out there care to make a case that Scott Weiser is not an idiot?

crickets chirping

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Canada's health care crisis	Scott Weiser	General	663	December 31st 10 01:32 PM
OT Bush propaganda against Kerry	basskisser	General	125	October 4th 04 09:22 PM
OT- Ode to Immigration	Harry Krause	General	83	July 27th 04 06:37 PM

Menu

About Us