Now, if a person WANTS to try to save someone, that's completely
different.


Yeah. And what I'm hearing from you is that you don't WANT to save anybody.
You COULD, but you don't WANT to.

A Usenet persona calling itself The Unreal Franklin wrote:


Now, if a person WANTS to try to save someone, that's completely
different.


Yeah. And what I'm hearing from you is that you don't WANT to save anybody.
You COULD, but you don't WANT to.


Actually, I've spent most of my life saving people, as a Red Cross
instructor, EMT, ER technician, police officer and firefighter, not to
mention my volunteer activities in search and rescue with the Civil Air
Patrol.

How many lives have YOU saved?

You make the common mistake of attributing character traits to a person
based on a Usenet debate.

Which means that you actually know ****-all about me. What I know about you,
however, is that you're a tiny-minded wiper of other people's bottoms who
makes snap judgments and post insulting comments because you're too stupid
to wrap you're puny intellect around the concept of "debate."

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

You make the common mistake of attributing character traits to a person
based on a Usenet debate.

Which means that you actually know ****-all about me. What I know about
you,
however, is that you're a tiny-minded wiper of other people's bottoms who
makes snap judgments and post insulting comments because you're too stupid
to wrap you're puny intellect around the concept of "debate."



Lessee... oh, here it is:


You make the common mistake of attributing character traits to a person
based on a Usenet debate.

Pot...kettle...black.

Oooh, the Civil Air Patrol. Sorrreee, Colonel. I take it all back. Your
compassion is unrelenting. You are the savior of all humanity.

The Unreal Franklin wrote:

You make the common mistake of attributing character traits to a person
based on a Usenet debate.

Which means that you actually know ****-all about me. What I know about
you,
however, is that you're a tiny-minded wiper of other people's bottoms who
makes snap judgments and post insulting comments because you're too stupid
to wrap you're puny intellect around the concept of "debate."



Lessee... oh, here it is:


You make the common mistake of attributing character traits to a person
based on a Usenet debate.

Pot...kettle...black.

Oooh, the Civil Air Patrol. Sorrreee, Colonel. I take it all back. Your
compassion is unrelenting. You are the savior of all humanity.

Dude, you haven't lived 'til you've seen Sadder-butt Weiser put his
hands together, making little rings with his thumbs and forefingers,
then rotate his wrists so the rings act like goggles and the rest of
his fingers form an oxygen mask. Then he sings "Junior Birdmen" and
revels in his humanitarianism.

Brings a lump to the throat of every gawd-fearing Merkin.


-Richard, His Kanubic Travesty
--
================================================== ====================
Richard Hopley Winston-Salem, NC, USA
.. rhopley[at]earthlink[dot]net
.. Nothing really matters except Boats, Sex, and Rock'n'Roll
.. rhopley[at]wfubmc[dot]edu
.. OK, OK; computer programming for scientific research also matters
================================================== ====================

A Usenet persona calling itself Oci-One Kanubi wrote:

The Unreal Franklin wrote:

You make the common mistake of attributing character traits to a person
based on a Usenet debate.

Which means that you actually know ****-all about me. What I know about
you,
however, is that you're a tiny-minded wiper of other people's bottoms who
makes snap judgments and post insulting comments because you're too stupid
to wrap you're puny intellect around the concept of "debate."



Lessee... oh, here it is:


You make the common mistake of attributing character traits to a person
based on a Usenet debate.

Pot...kettle...black.

Oooh, the Civil Air Patrol. Sorrreee, Colonel. I take it all back. Your
compassion is unrelenting. You are the savior of all humanity.

Dude, you haven't lived 'til you've seen Sadder-butt Weiser put his
hands together, making little rings with his thumbs and forefingers,
then rotate his wrists so the rings act like goggles and the rest of
his fingers form an oxygen mask. Then he sings "Junior Birdmen" and
revels in his humanitarianism.

Brings a lump to the throat of every gawd-fearing Merkin.

How nice of you to denigrate tens of thousands of volunteers who find and
save aircraft accident victims, and have done so since before WWII. How very
respectful and diverse of you.

And all because you're too witless to actually form a cogent argument...

How typical.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

Scott Weiser wrote:
A Usenet persona calling itself Oci-One Kanubi wrote:

The Unreal Franklin wrote:

You make the common mistake of attributing character traits to a person
based on a Usenet debate.

Which means that you actually know ****-all about me. What I know about
you,
however, is that you're a tiny-minded wiper of other people's bottoms who
makes snap judgments and post insulting comments because you're too stupid
to wrap you're puny intellect around the concept of "debate."



Lessee... oh, here it is:


You make the common mistake of attributing character traits to a person
based on a Usenet debate.

Pot...kettle...black.

Oooh, the Civil Air Patrol. Sorrreee, Colonel. I take it all back. Your
compassion is unrelenting. You are the savior of all humanity.

Dude, you haven't lived 'til you've seen Sadder-butt Weiser put his
hands together, making little rings with his thumbs and forefingers,
then rotate his wrists so the rings act like goggles and the rest of
his fingers form an oxygen mask. Then he sings "Junior Birdmen" and
revels in his humanitarianism.

Brings a lump to the throat of every gawd-fearing Merkin.

How nice of you to denigrate tens of thousands of volunteers who find and
save aircraft accident victims, and have done so since before WWII. How very
respectful and diverse of you.

Scotty-me-lad, you need to register for the Reading Comprehension class
at yer local Remedial Ed institution. I wasn't denigrating the CAP,
you illiterate; I was denigrating YOU!

Gee-zeus, it is really no fun mocking someone who is too dim to even
get it. I keep learning that it is a total waste of my time to
correspond with you, but you keep sooooooooo setting yerself up for
lampooning that it's tough to resist.

Lurking now,
-Richard, His Kanubic Travesty
--
================================================== ====================
Richard Hopley Winston-Salem, NC, USA
.. rhopley[at]earthlink[dot]net
.. Nothing really matters except Boats, Sex, and Rock'n'Roll
.. rhopley[at]wfubmc[dot]edu
.. OK, OK; computer programming for scientific research also matters
================================================== ====================

A Usenet persona calling itself Oci-One Kanubi wrote:


Oooh, the Civil Air Patrol. Sorrreee, Colonel. I take it all back. Your
compassion is unrelenting. You are the savior of all humanity.

Dude, you haven't lived 'til you've seen Sadder-butt Weiser put his
hands together, making little rings with his thumbs and forefingers,
then rotate his wrists so the rings act like goggles and the rest of
his fingers form an oxygen mask. Then he sings "Junior Birdmen" and
revels in his humanitarianism.

Brings a lump to the throat of every gawd-fearing Merkin.

How nice of you to denigrate tens of thousands of volunteers who find and
save aircraft accident victims, and have done so since before WWII. How very
respectful and diverse of you.

Scotty-me-lad, you need to register for the Reading Comprehension class
at yer local Remedial Ed institution. I wasn't denigrating the CAP,
you illiterate; I was denigrating YOU!

Of course you were. The point, however, is that you also denigrated CAP in
the process, not to mention every other person who volunteers to save other
people. Volunteer who put themselves at risk are due respect, even if you
don't happen to like them for reasons of your own personal cupidity and
selfishness. When you denigrate the altruism of one, you denigrate the
altruism of all.

You see, it's you who is too dim to get it. Your blind, unreasoning hatred
doesn't allow you to even attempt to make a rational reply to a debate that
you aren't even participating in. Instead of simply ignoring the thread,
which is what an adult would do, you decide to hurl insults instead because
you're too intellectually incapacitated to formulate a cogent reply.

Unsurprising in the extreme, but watching you foam at the mouth any time I
post anything is amusing. I can hardly wait to see the little blood vessels
in your temples throb when the whole trespass-by-floating issue hits the
courts in Colorado, as it's about to do. Try not to have a stroke.

Gee-zeus, it is really no fun mocking someone who is too dim to even
get it. I keep learning that it is a total waste of my time to
correspond with you,

One of the hallmarks of mental defect you exhibit is an inability to learn
from past mistakes. Perhaps some occupational therapy and counseling would
help.

but you keep sooooooooo setting yerself up for
lampooning that it's tough to resist.

Well, I must admit that trying to convince you of anything is pointless.

However, you're not the audience, you're just the foil.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

A Usenet persona calling itself The Unreal Franklin wrote:


You make the common mistake of attributing character traits to a person
based on a Usenet debate.

Which means that you actually know ****-all about me. What I know about
you,
however, is that you're a tiny-minded wiper of other people's bottoms who
makes snap judgments and post insulting comments because you're too stupid
to wrap you're puny intellect around the concept of "debate."



Lessee... oh, here it is:


You make the common mistake of attributing character traits to a person
based on a Usenet debate.

Pot...kettle...black.

Wrong. Your deliberate ad hominem insults were not "debate," they were just
insults, which makes an assessment of your character rather more accurate
and my analysis of it appropriate.


Oooh, the Civil Air Patrol. Sorrreee, Colonel. I take it all back. Your
compassion is unrelenting. You are the savior of all humanity.

Evidently to a much greater extent than you are. BTW, it's Lieutenant, not
Colonel.
--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser