Thread
:
Canada's Health Care Crisis - update
View Single Post
#
26
KMAN
Posts: n/a
in article , Scott Weiser at
wrote on 6/22/05 9:06 PM:
A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote:
Scotts figures:
=============
Voluntary insurance is fine. Compulsory insurance is not, including
compulsory "liability" insurance we have to carry on our vehicles.
==============
WRONG!
I need to know that when you put me out of action through an automobile
accident, that you'll have enough insurance to cover my loss of income
and sundry other expenses.
Why do you "need" to know this? What makes you believe that you have some
inherent right to know this, or to demand that I have anything at all by way
of insurance? Can you state any principle in the Constitution that gives you
this "right" to demand such things of me? I think not.
There's nothing in the Constitution that specifically states that Scott
Weiser has the right to be an idiot, and yet, you persist.
Reply With Quote