Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Weiser wrote:
: A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote: : Query to Scott, who claims: : ============ : the whole point of my statement in re health care is that it's wron to : COMPEL someone to pay for another's bad habits, bad genetics or bad : luck. : =========== : : Scott, why is it NOT wrong to COMPEL someone to pay for another's bad : habits, bad genetics or bad luck in areas other than heathcare? If it : is not wrong to do so in areas other than healthcare, what might those : areas be? Further, how/why do you make the distinction? : : Well, first, I said it IS wrong to compel someone to pay for another's bad : habits, bad genetics or bad luck in re health care. This does not imply that : it is otherwise acceptable to compel someone in other areas. This is the : logical fallacy of the extended analogy and is a red herring argument. Scotty; First, I'm guessing "wron" is "wrong"... right? The concept behind all insurance is some people are paying for someone elses claim... otherwise, we'd all be paying cash every time we visit the doc for anything... surgery too... same with car insurance, homeowners insurance... life insurance... You, your company (or your trust fund) pay $'s hoping that you will pay in less than you use in services... We the taxpayers also help fund this because Uncle Sam makes it a tax deduction for companies that are paying for all or part of a employee's health insurance costs... It's the same with taxes... when it comes to road taxes, smaller trucks subsidize larger trucks, smaller cars subsidize larger cars like your hummer (if you still have it) when it comes to paying for our nations roads. It's the American way to expect someone else to foot at least part of your bill... : It may well be wrong to compel someone to pay for another's bad habits, bad : genetics or bad luck in other areas...or not. However, what we are : discussing at the moment is health care. : I note that you don't dispute my statement. Do I therefore take it that you : agree with me? I would never agree with you... isn't there someplace else you'd rather be than R.B.P.? -- John Nelson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org (A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Canada's health care crisis | General | |||
OT Bush propaganda against Kerry | General | |||
OT- Ode to Immigration | General |