"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c5us59


What was that plan? Oh...our troops would be met with gifts of flowers
and virgins, or some nonsense.


There were no "...repeated warnings of an imminent al Qaeda attack
before
9/11..."


Hehehe. Ignoring everything that has been revealed to date, eh? Wait,
there is more to come.


See my response to Jim, above.

You guys should put a poll together,,, ask if the net lives saved so far
justifies Bush's agenda? Ask if the figure 40,000 lives murdered each year
(on average) that has stopped is something that Bush might have thought
about.
Because you morons would have criticized Bush had he done nothing and the
40,000 lives lost every year (on average) in Iraq would have continued.
Do you morons believe that the Iraqi lives are not worth saving? Because you
seem to have a problem with this "unexpected""" benefit that seems to have
just happened without thought.....

GYHAS







"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c5us59


What was that plan? Oh...our troops would be met with gifts of flowers
and virgins, or some nonsense.


There were no "...repeated warnings of an imminent al Qaeda attack
before
9/11..."


Hehehe. Ignoring everything that has been revealed to date, eh? Wait,
there is more to come.


See my response to Jim, above.

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
You guys should put a poll together,,, ask if the net lives saved so far
justifies Bush's agenda? Ask if the figure 40,000 lives murdered each year
(on average) that has stopped is something that Bush might have thought
about.
Because you morons would have criticized Bush had he done nothing and the
40,000 lives lost every year (on average) in Iraq would have continued.
Do you morons believe that the Iraqi lives are not worth saving? Because
you
seem to have a problem with this "unexpected""" benefit that seems to have
just happened without thought.....

GYHAS


From an earlier post

8,875 to 10,725. The minimum and maximum estimates of the number of Iraqi
civilians killed in Iraq so far,

3,466. The total of American soldiers wounded in action in Iraq through
April 17, 2004,

793. Total coalition soldiers killed in Iraq since the war began,

600. The number of people killed during the current siege of Fallujah

110. The number of coalition soldiers killed in November 2003

92. The number of coalition soldiers (65 Americans and 27 Brits) killed in
March 2003

91. The number of coalition soldiers killed in April 2004,

Also which of your numbers are we to believe -- in one instance you say

"Ask if the figure 40,000 lives murdered each year (on average) that has
stopped is something that Bush might have thought about."

In another

"
"Do you know that the net lives saved so far is approximately 30,000 lives?"

And to answer your question -- NO, I DON"T think Bush thought about it. I
doubt Bush does much thinking at all.
"

" Tuuk" wrote
You guys should put a poll together,,, ask if the net lives saved so far
justifies Bush's agenda? Ask if the figure 40,000 lives murdered each year
(on average) that has stopped is something that Bush might have thought
about.
Because you morons would have criticized Bush had he done nothing and the
40,000 lives lost every year (on average) in Iraq would have continued.
Do you morons believe that the Iraqi lives are not worth saving? Because
you
seem to have a problem with this "unexpected""" benefit that seems to have
just happened without thought.....

Are you talking about the lives lost due to the US embargo on Iraq?
If so, maybe you can tell us if the embargo is still enacted?

Come on,,, get with the program








"Don" wrote in message
...
" Tuuk" wrote
You guys should put a poll together,,, ask if the net lives saved so far
justifies Bush's agenda? Ask if the figure 40,000 lives murdered each
year
(on average) that has stopped is something that Bush might have thought
about.
Because you morons would have criticized Bush had he done nothing and
the
40,000 lives lost every year (on average) in Iraq would have continued.
Do you morons believe that the Iraqi lives are not worth saving? Because
you
seem to have a problem with this "unexpected""" benefit that seems to
have
just happened without thought.....

Are you talking about the lives lost due to the US embargo on Iraq?
If so, maybe you can tell us if the embargo is still enacted?

"Don" wrote
" Tuuk" wrote
You guys should put a poll together,,, ask if the net lives saved so
far
justifies Bush's agenda? Ask if the figure 40,000 lives murdered each
year
(on average) that has stopped is something that Bush might have
thought
about.
Because you morons would have criticized Bush had he done nothing and
the
40,000 lives lost every year (on average) in Iraq would have
continued.
Do you morons believe that the Iraqi lives are not worth saving?
Because
you
seem to have a problem with this "unexpected""" benefit that seems to
have
just happened without thought.....

Are you talking about the lives lost due to the US embargo on Iraq?
If so, maybe you can tell us if the embargo is still enacted?

" Tuuk" wrote
Come on,,, get with the program

So, you don't know the answer?

Did you find it yet,,, or do I need to point it out to you?

should I hold your hand and walk you over to it? Just like they had to do on
Easter egg hunts for you? Just like they had to do with answer on quizzes in
school? Lemme know,, I do not mind helping you...... I cannot do everything
for you ,,, you know.







"Don" wrote in message
...
"Don" wrote
" Tuuk" wrote
You guys should put a poll together,,, ask if the net lives saved so
far
justifies Bush's agenda? Ask if the figure 40,000 lives murdered
each
year
(on average) that has stopped is something that Bush might have
thought
about.
Because you morons would have criticized Bush had he done nothing
and
the
40,000 lives lost every year (on average) in Iraq would have
continued.
Do you morons believe that the Iraqi lives are not worth saving?
Because
you
seem to have a problem with this "unexpected""" benefit that seems
to
have
just happened without thought.....

Are you talking about the lives lost due to the US embargo on Iraq?
If so, maybe you can tell us if the embargo is still enacted?

" Tuuk" wrote
Come on,,, get with the program

So, you don't know the answer?

Are you capable of the answering the question?
A simple yes or no will suffice.
If you are capable of answering the question then please do so.
If you are not capable of answering the question then just admit it and move
on. Thanks.

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
Did you find it yet,,, or do I need to point it out to you?

should I hold your hand and walk you over to it? Just like they had to do
on
Easter egg hunts for you? Just like they had to do with answer on quizzes
in
school? Lemme know,, I do not mind helping you...... I cannot do
everything
for you ,,, you know.







"Don" wrote in message
...
"Don" wrote
" Tuuk" wrote
You guys should put a poll together,,, ask if the net lives saved
so
far
justifies Bush's agenda? Ask if the figure 40,000 lives murdered
each
year
(on average) that has stopped is something that Bush might have
thought
about.
Because you morons would have criticized Bush had he done nothing
and
the
40,000 lives lost every year (on average) in Iraq would have
continued.
Do you morons believe that the Iraqi lives are not worth saving?
Because
you
seem to have a problem with this "unexpected""" benefit that seems
to
have
just happened without thought.....

Are you talking about the lives lost due to the US embargo on Iraq?
If so, maybe you can tell us if the embargo is still enacted?

" Tuuk" wrote
Come on,,, get with the program

So, you don't know the answer?