John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph
Min)
wrote...

...a load of horse ****.
--
John H


There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so
hard to change to??????

wrote in message
oups.com...

John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph
Min)
wrote...

...a load of horse ****.
--
John H


There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so
hard to change to??????


Have you went through the day with a positive attitude Kevin? Give it a
go....you will like it. ;-)

On 17 May 2005 05:08:29 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph
Min)
wrote...

...a load of horse ****.
--
John H


There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so
hard to change to??????

He wasn't from our group. I could care less about the group he posted from. Does
changing the tone of the group upset you? You seem to be having a hard time with
the idea.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 17 May 2005 05:08:29 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel
Joseph
Min)
wrote...

...a load of horse ****.
--
John H


There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying
so
hard to change to??????

He wasn't from our group. I could care less about the group he posted
from. Does
changing the tone of the group upset you? You seem to be having a
hard time with
the idea.
--
John H

Crap, are you drinking alot, again, John? You seem to have a hard time
understanding that anyone with any sense at all wouldn't think that
spewing profanity, like "horse****", "bull****", etc, as you do daily,
is HELPING "the tone of the group". Now, I'll try to ask it again so
that you may comprehend the question. Do you think that by using
profanity in YOUR posts and YOUR replies, is "helping change the tone
of the newsgroup" for the better?

On 17 May 2005 11:28:14 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 17 May 2005 05:08:29 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel
Joseph
Min)
wrote...

...a load of horse ****.
--
John H


There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying
so
hard to change to??????

He wasn't from our group. I could care less about the group he posted
from. Does
changing the tone of the group upset you? You seem to be having a
hard time with
the idea.
--
John H

Crap, are you drinking alot, again, John? You seem to have a hard time
understanding that anyone with any sense at all wouldn't think that
spewing profanity, like "horse****", "bull****", etc, as you do daily,
is HELPING "the tone of the group". Now, I'll try to ask it again so
that you may comprehend the question. Do you think that by using
profanity in YOUR posts and YOUR replies, is "helping change the tone
of the newsgroup" for the better?

bk, you seem to be looking for an argument today. OK...
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:

Crap, are you drinking alot, again, John? You seem to have a hard
time
understanding that anyone with any sense at all wouldn't think that
spewing profanity, like "horse****", "bull****", etc, as you do
daily,
is HELPING "the tone of the group". Now, I'll try to ask it again so
that you may comprehend the question. Do you think that by using
profanity in YOUR posts and YOUR replies, is "helping change the
tone
of the newsgroup" for the better?

bk, you seem to be looking for an argument today. OK...
--
John H


Ah, no, John, I'm looking for you to answer my question.