Democrats **REPENT** Before It's Too Late(!)
 

On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph Min)
wrote...

....a load of horse ****.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Mon, 16 May 2005 21:36:10 GMT, "Clams Canino" wrote:


"Daniel Joseph Min" wrote in message
...

So, here we are in the last days of the old (4th) empire,

No, come Wednesday night Palpatine will revail himself as an agent of the
Dark Side and overthrow the republic creating the Evil Empire. I saw the
trailer already, you can't fool me.

I already have my tickets.

-W ( I just had to)

Hell, "Hercules" is on NBC as we type. Isn't that some kind of documentary about
gods and etc.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 16 May 2005 22:30:42 GMT, John Bokma wrote:

Daniel Joseph Min wrote:

Download Free Astro-Books by Daniel Joseph Min:
http://danieljosephmin.tripod.com/

The page you are attempting to access has been removed because it violated
Tripod's Terms of Service.

http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/danieljosephmin/

The page you are attempting to access has been removed because it violated
Angelfire's Terms of Service.

More will follow.

Damn shame. Feel free to disregard us.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 16 May 2005 23:24:00 -0000, er (Freddy the
bad one) wrote:

On 16 May 2005, Daniel Joseph Min wrote:

What the ****!!!!

This is a boating newsgroup asshole!! Get the **** out. Keep your off topic
posts somewhere else, like up your ass.

You stupid ****ing asshole. Retarded ****head.

Freddy the bad one


Freddy, name-calling does not contribute to group harmony. I'd almost rather see
his post than yours!

Have *you* been fishing lately?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph
Min)
wrote...

...a load of horse ****.
--
John H


There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so
hard to change to??????

wrote in message
oups.com...

John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph
Min)
wrote...

...a load of horse ****.
--
John H


There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so
hard to change to??????


Have you went through the day with a positive attitude Kevin? Give it a
go....you will like it. ;-)

On 17 May 2005 05:08:29 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph
Min)
wrote...

...a load of horse ****.
--
John H


There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so
hard to change to??????

He wasn't from our group. I could care less about the group he posted from. Does
changing the tone of the group upset you? You seem to be having a hard time with
the idea.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Tue, 17 May 2005 08:22:34 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

wrote:
John H wrote:

On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph

Min)

wrote...

...a load of horse (Herring's expletive deleted)
--
John H



There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so
hard to change to??????





How about just ignoring all the Smithers? Isn't that easier?


I don't think the 'daniel joseph' guy is a Smithers.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Tue, 17 May 2005 10:33:04 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2005 08:22:34 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


wrote:

John H wrote:


On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph

Min)


wrote...

...a load of horse (Herring's expletive deleted)
--
John H



There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so
hard to change to??????





How about just ignoring all the Smithers? Isn't that easier?



I don't think the 'daniel joseph' guy is a Smithers.




My definition of a "Smithers" includes:

The "original" Smithers, of course; the idiot who posts here under at
least 30 different handles, including those of other posters here (or
their family members) and whose posts are aimed mostly at disruption or
antagonizing. Easy to filter.

The plethora of "anonymous" pest posters that hit us a couple of weeks
ago, and came to stay. Easy to filter.

The droolers and drunks who add absolutely nothing to this newsgroup,
ever. I still read posts from one or two of them, but the rest are
filtered. Most of them are also the "anonymous" posters mentioned above.

Those "anons" from other newsgroups whose posts end up here and someone
have a life of their own, even if for a short time. (the example you are
citing).


Since I coined the term "Smithers" as a kind of newsgroup post, I
suppose I can proffer its definition! :}


Well, I suppose so, but the way I saw it, the Smithers posts all had one thing
in common, a personal attack against you. Also, Smithers himself coined the
term, you just applied a definition.

The 'daniel joseph min' guy didn't fall into that category.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 17 May 2005 05:08:29 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel
Joseph
Min)
wrote...

...a load of horse ****.
--
John H


There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying
so
hard to change to??????

He wasn't from our group. I could care less about the group he posted
from. Does
changing the tone of the group upset you? You seem to be having a
hard time with
the idea.
--
John H

Crap, are you drinking alot, again, John? You seem to have a hard time
understanding that anyone with any sense at all wouldn't think that
spewing profanity, like "horse****", "bull****", etc, as you do daily,
is HELPING "the tone of the group". Now, I'll try to ask it again so
that you may comprehend the question. Do you think that by using
profanity in YOUR posts and YOUR replies, is "helping change the tone
of the newsgroup" for the better?