|
Democrats **REPENT** Before It's Too Late(!)
On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph Min)
wrote... ....a load of horse ****. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
On Mon, 16 May 2005 21:36:10 GMT, "Clams Canino" wrote:
"Daniel Joseph Min" wrote in message ... So, here we are in the last days of the old (4th) empire, No, come Wednesday night Palpatine will revail himself as an agent of the Dark Side and overthrow the republic creating the Evil Empire. I saw the trailer already, you can't fool me. I already have my tickets. -W ( I just had to) Hell, "Hercules" is on NBC as we type. Isn't that some kind of documentary about gods and etc. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
On 16 May 2005 22:30:42 GMT, John Bokma wrote:
Daniel Joseph Min wrote: Download Free Astro-Books by Daniel Joseph Min: http://danieljosephmin.tripod.com/ The page you are attempting to access has been removed because it violated Tripod's Terms of Service. http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/danieljosephmin/ The page you are attempting to access has been removed because it violated Angelfire's Terms of Service. More will follow. Damn shame. Feel free to disregard us. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
|
John H wrote: On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph Min) wrote... ...a load of horse ****. -- John H There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so hard to change to?????? |
wrote in message oups.com... John H wrote: On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph Min) wrote... ...a load of horse ****. -- John H There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so hard to change to?????? Have you went through the day with a positive attitude Kevin? Give it a go....you will like it. ;-) |
On Tue, 17 May 2005 08:22:34 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote: wrote: John H wrote: On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph Min) wrote... ...a load of horse (Herring's expletive deleted) -- John H There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so hard to change to?????? How about just ignoring all the Smithers? Isn't that easier? I don't think the 'daniel joseph' guy is a Smithers. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
On Tue, 17 May 2005 10:33:04 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote: John H wrote: On Tue, 17 May 2005 08:22:34 -0400, "Harry.Krause" wrote: wrote: John H wrote: On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph Min) wrote... ...a load of horse (Herring's expletive deleted) -- John H There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so hard to change to?????? How about just ignoring all the Smithers? Isn't that easier? I don't think the 'daniel joseph' guy is a Smithers. My definition of a "Smithers" includes: The "original" Smithers, of course; the idiot who posts here under at least 30 different handles, including those of other posters here (or their family members) and whose posts are aimed mostly at disruption or antagonizing. Easy to filter. The plethora of "anonymous" pest posters that hit us a couple of weeks ago, and came to stay. Easy to filter. The droolers and drunks who add absolutely nothing to this newsgroup, ever. I still read posts from one or two of them, but the rest are filtered. Most of them are also the "anonymous" posters mentioned above. Those "anons" from other newsgroups whose posts end up here and someone have a life of their own, even if for a short time. (the example you are citing). Since I coined the term "Smithers" as a kind of newsgroup post, I suppose I can proffer its definition! :} Well, I suppose so, but the way I saw it, the Smithers posts all had one thing in common, a personal attack against you. Also, Smithers himself coined the term, you just applied a definition. The 'daniel joseph min' guy didn't fall into that category. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
John H wrote: On 17 May 2005 05:08:29 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph Min) wrote... ...a load of horse ****. -- John H There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so hard to change to?????? He wasn't from our group. I could care less about the group he posted from. Does changing the tone of the group upset you? You seem to be having a hard time with the idea. -- John H Crap, are you drinking alot, again, John? You seem to have a hard time understanding that anyone with any sense at all wouldn't think that spewing profanity, like "horse****", "bull****", etc, as you do daily, is HELPING "the tone of the group". Now, I'll try to ask it again so that you may comprehend the question. Do you think that by using profanity in YOUR posts and YOUR replies, is "helping change the tone of the newsgroup" for the better? |
|
On 17 May 2005 11:28:14 -0700, wrote:
John H wrote: On 17 May 2005 05:08:29 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 16 May 2005 20:53:13 -0000, (Daniel Joseph Min) wrote... ...a load of horse ****. -- John H There you go! THAT'S the "tone of the newsgroup" that you are trying so hard to change to?????? He wasn't from our group. I could care less about the group he posted from. Does changing the tone of the group upset you? You seem to be having a hard time with the idea. -- John H Crap, are you drinking alot, again, John? You seem to have a hard time understanding that anyone with any sense at all wouldn't think that spewing profanity, like "horse****", "bull****", etc, as you do daily, is HELPING "the tone of the group". Now, I'll try to ask it again so that you may comprehend the question. Do you think that by using profanity in YOUR posts and YOUR replies, is "helping change the tone of the newsgroup" for the better? bk, you seem to be looking for an argument today. OK... -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
John H wrote: Crap, are you drinking alot, again, John? You seem to have a hard time understanding that anyone with any sense at all wouldn't think that spewing profanity, like "horse****", "bull****", etc, as you do daily, is HELPING "the tone of the group". Now, I'll try to ask it again so that you may comprehend the question. Do you think that by using profanity in YOUR posts and YOUR replies, is "helping change the tone of the newsgroup" for the better? bk, you seem to be looking for an argument today. OK... -- John H Ah, no, John, I'm looking for you to answer my question. |
Harry.Krause wrote: wrote: John H wrote: Crap, are you drinking alot, again, John? You seem to have a hard time understanding that anyone with any sense at all wouldn't think that spewing profanity, like "horse****", "bull****", etc, as you do daily, is HELPING "the tone of the group". Now, I'll try to ask it again so that you may comprehend the question. Do you think that by using profanity in YOUR posts and YOUR replies, is "helping change the tone of the newsgroup" for the better? bk, you seem to be looking for an argument today. OK... -- John H Ah, no, John, I'm looking for you to answer my question. Why don't you, Fritz, Hertvik, and Herring try ignoring each other for, say, a year or so? :} Calm down Harry. Your kind of calling the kettle black here. Seems you don't mind engaging those people. |
I'm not even a Democrat, and this thread certainly inspired me to
repent-- I'm sorry I opened it. :-) |
On Wed, 18 May 2005 08:22:24 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote: wrote: John H wrote: Crap, are you drinking alot, again, John? You seem to have a hard time understanding that anyone with any sense at all wouldn't think that spewing profanity, like "horse****", "bull****", etc, as you do daily, is HELPING "the tone of the group". Now, I'll try to ask it again so that you may comprehend the question. Do you think that by using profanity in YOUR posts and YOUR replies, is "helping change the tone of the newsgroup" for the better? bk, you seem to be looking for an argument today. OK... -- John H Ah, no, John, I'm looking for you to answer my question. Why don't you, Fritz, Hertvik, and Herring try ignoring each other for, say, a year or so? :} Harry, why do you leave yourself out? How about something like: "How about if you, Fritz, Hertvik, Herring (who has been pretty good lately), and myself knock off the inane, name-calling, babyish, political bickering for say a year or so? :) -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
On 18 May 2005 09:09:03 -0700, wrote:
Harry.Krause wrote: wrote: John H wrote: Crap, are you drinking alot, again, John? You seem to have a hard time understanding that anyone with any sense at all wouldn't think that spewing profanity, like "horse****", "bull****", etc, as you do daily, is HELPING "the tone of the group". Now, I'll try to ask it again so that you may comprehend the question. Do you think that by using profanity in YOUR posts and YOUR replies, is "helping change the tone of the newsgroup" for the better? bk, you seem to be looking for an argument today. OK... -- John H Ah, no, John, I'm looking for you to answer my question. Why don't you, Fritz, Hertvik, and Herring try ignoring each other for, say, a year or so? :} Calm down Harry. Your kind of calling the kettle black here. Seems you don't mind engaging those people. "you're" -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com