On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:14:44 +0000, HugYourPug wrote:

What are the relative merits of each. I have been looking at some boats and the
inboards seem to offer a lot more boat for the money, but a lot of people buy
outboards, so there must be some merit there. Fishing, cruising and skiing are
the objective.

Well, we've been around this one many times, but I'll add a few minor things:

1. Sound. I like the sound of I/O's better. They roar rather than scream.

2. Horsepower. Yes, I know outboards now come in 225, maybe even 250. But I/O's
pretty much start there, and go up to 500-700hp. So if you're looking for
100-150 hp, outboard may be right for you. Over 200 (especially over 250), the
I/O or straight inboard starts to look better.

3. Cooling. I/Os and inboards are available in "fresh-water cooling", where the
engine is cooled with coolant rather than seawater. IMHO, a MUST for running in
salt water.

4. Diesel. Notwithstanding KS, you can't get a diesel outboard.

And, as you've mentioned, outboards cost a lot more. And, I personally just
don't like bolting 200hp and 500lb to the transom - I'd rather see it on the
stringers. And, having repaired both on the water, I'd take the I/O for ease of
"emergency repairs" every time.

Lloyd Sumpter
"The Tin Boat" Mirrocraft 12 c/w Johnson 15