On 27 Apr 2005 07:30:07 -0700, wrote:


ME and my Shadow wrote:
JohnH,
Don't you love watching lil Kevin imitating Harry. I wonder if Kevin
even
knows what "et al" means.


Smithers, first, I'm not Kevin, second, I'm not "lil", and third, yes,
I do know what et al means, which is AND OTHERS. If you have any more
questions concerning me, why not ask ME, as opposed to John. He doesn't
know me, has never met me.

I believe that you, Kevin, and basskisser are one and the same.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 26 Apr 2005 12:38:32 -0700, wrote:


ME ME ME wrote:
Harry,

Darn if we only had a parliamentary form of government, this
Gallup
Poll
would have some significance.

Do you feel better now?

Smithers et al, do YOU feel better knowing that, regardless of our
"form of government" that our president misled us? Is it okay for
the
president to lie us into a war in a democracy? Remember, Hitler was
good at doing just what Bush is doing, leading the lemmings that
would
follow him off the end of the earth into believing that everything
he's
done, even lying to the people is good and just.

Where's your proof that he lied, i.e. knowingly said something that
wasn't true.
You are always the first to ask for proof of 'wild allegations'.
--
John H

No problem:

You don't believe Bush lied?

How about this:


"Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at
[past nuclear] sites."
Bush speech to the nation - 10/7/2002


The truth?


Two months of inspections at these former Iraqi nuclear sites found
zero evidence of prohibited nuclear activities there
IAEA report to UN Security Council - 1/27/2003


Or this:
"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought

significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
State of the Union Address - 1/28/2003


The truth:
The documents implied were known at the time by Bush to be forged and
not credible. This has been proven.


Or this:
"We gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let
them in."
Bush Press Conference 7/14/2003


The truth:
UN inspectors went into Iraq to search for possible weapons violations
from December 2002 into March 2003.

On 27 Apr 2005 07:27:34 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 26 Apr 2005 12:38:32 -0700, wrote:


ME ME ME wrote:
Harry,

Darn if we only had a parliamentary form of government, this
Gallup
Poll
would have some significance.

Do you feel better now?

Smithers et al, do YOU feel better knowing that, regardless of our
"form of government" that our president misled us? Is it okay for
the
president to lie us into a war in a democracy? Remember, Hitler was
good at doing just what Bush is doing, leading the lemmings that
would
follow him off the end of the earth into believing that everything
he's
done, even lying to the people is good and just.

Where's your proof that he lied, i.e. knowingly said something that
wasn't true.
You are always the first to ask for proof of 'wild allegations'.
--
John H

No problem:

You don't believe Bush lied?

I said nothing about my beliefs. I asked for your proof that he *knowingly* said
something that wasn't true. You've not done so.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
...now believe the Bush Administration deliberately "misled" them on Iraq
prior to our invading that country.

Think about how stupid the "average" American is...and then consider the
fact that half this country is dumber than that. Gallup managed to find
*that* 50%.