Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OT Bill and Fritz, an official reply from Labatt
To prove that I am right, and you two aren't, I emailed Labatt, and
asked their take on the Labatt vs. Labatt's issue. As you know, you two claim that Labatt's is correct. I've stated it hasn't been correct since the 70's. Anyway, this should steam you two!: Thank you for your e-mail Curtis and taking the time to leave us your comments. Our corporate name becomes more one language without the "s" and can be used in a consistent manner for French language communication activities. This issue became more significant when we acquired breweries in Italy in the late 1970's and more recently as we expanded our presence in Mexico and other South American countries. All of our Labatt products as of 1970's do not have the 's, and the registered trademark of our various beers and ales is Labatt. As Labatt's was officially changed to Labatt, it is no longer part of our registered trademark agreements. Regards, Yvette Labatt Customer Service -----Original Message----- From: ] Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:52 AM To: Subject: Curtis has a Labatt Web Site: Request realname: Curtis 01-street: 02-city: Smyrna 03-province: Georgia 04-country: US 05-othercountry: 06-code: email: 07-phone: 08-fax: subject: Labatt Web Site: Request 10-comments: Hi, I'd like to know about the name change from Labatt's Blue, to Labatt Blue, without the 's. Someone in a newsgroup I belong to contends that it is Labatt's, I say it's not. Your bottle label proves that, but, he's pretty dumb, so I thought that if he heard it from the horse's mouth, so to speak..... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT for Fritz and Calif Bill - it's LABATT | General |