To prove that I am right, and you two aren't, I emailed Labatt, and
asked their take on the Labatt vs. Labatt's issue. As you know, you two
claim that Labatt's is correct. I've stated it hasn't been correct
since the 70's. Anyway, this should steam you two!:

Thank you for your e-mail Curtis and taking the time to leave us your
comments. Our corporate name becomes more one language without the "s"

and
can be used in a consistent manner for French language communication
activities. This issue became more significant when we acquired
breweries
in Italy in the late 1970's and more recently as we expanded our
presence in
Mexico and other South American countries. All of our Labatt products
as of 1970's do not have the 's, and the registered trademark of our
various beers and ales is Labatt. As Labatt's was officially changed to
Labatt, it is no longer part of our registered trademark agreements.


Regards,

Yvette
Labatt Customer Service

-----Original Message-----
From: ]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:52 AM
To:
Subject: Curtis has a Labatt Web Site: Request


realname: Curtis
01-street:
02-city: Smyrna
03-province: Georgia
04-country: US
05-othercountry:
06-code:
email:
07-phone:
08-fax:
subject: Labatt Web Site: Request
10-comments: Hi, I'd like to know about the name change from Labatt's
Blue,
to Labatt Blue, without the 's. Someone in a newsgroup I belong to
contends
that it is Labatt's, I say it's not. Your bottle label proves that,
but,
he's pretty dumb, so I thought that if he heard it from the horse's
mouth,
so to speak.....

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in your mind
so you can move on already.

"JimH" wrote in message
...
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid bending
forward, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in your mind
so you can move on already.


Edit...'forward'...not 'forwards'.

On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why
it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

Hmm, why don't YOU do this John? YOU email Labatt, it's easy go to
http://www.labatt.com Notice, no 's'. There is a place to contact them.
You can either phone them, or email them. YOU ask them. You'll get the
same response!

On 4 Apr 2005 04:52:59 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why
it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

Hmm, why don't YOU do this John? YOU email Labatt, it's easy go to
http://www.labatt.com Notice, no 's'. There is a place to contact them.
You can either phone them, or email them. YOU ask them. You'll get the
same response!

Why?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 4 Apr 2005 04:52:59 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:


John H wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining
why
it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

Hmm, why don't YOU do this John? YOU email Labatt, it's easy go to
http://www.labatt.com Notice, no 's'. There is a place to contact
them.
You can either phone them, or email them. YOU ask them. You'll get
the
same response!

Why?
--
John H

Because you've implied that the email I sent was "made up" by saying
this:
"I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why
it's really Labatt's!" I'll tell you one thing, you won't find anything
from the Labatt people that states that it's called "Labatt's". Only
from Fritz and Bill.

John H wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why
it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

John, here's the complete header. Are you trying to say I'm lying? You
give it a try!

Authentication-Results: mta208.mail.dcn.yahoo.com from=labatt.com;
domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
X-Originating-IP: [207.61.44.236]
Return-Path:
Received: from 207.61.44.236 (EHLO smtpmx1.labatt.com) (207.61.44.236)
by mta208.mail.dcn.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:55:33 -0800

Received: from NALDNMX1.na.interbrew.net ([172.20.71.41]) by
smtpmx1.labatt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 1 Apr
2005 10:55:41 -0500
Received: by naldnmx1.na.interbrew.net with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id G5DFJLNZ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:54:32 -0500
Message-ID:
23188AA6AA75144486BDBE8CE75E9E5402EAFD41@nahfxms1 .na.interbrew.net
From: "LCS Internet Mail" Add to Address Book
To: '" , "LCS Internet Mail"

Subject: Curtis has a Labatt Web Site: Request
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:54:26 -0500
Return-Receipt-To: LCS Internet Mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-Path:
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2005 15:55:41.0187 (UTC)
FILETIME=[4152C530:01C536D3]
Content-Length: 684

On 4 Apr 2005 05:21:09 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why
it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

John, here's the complete header. Are you trying to say I'm lying? You
give it a try!

Why?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"JimH" wrote in message
...
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in your
mind
so you can move on already.




Since asslicker has long been killfiled I have no idea what he
said...though I can guess it,
The fact is that Labatt's is commonly still used has I proved in numerous
links, unlike his supposed "cow down" or 'schnapps = whiskey' or his degree
from Ga. Tech.