In article ,
says...

"thunder" wrote in message

"Clintons" continue Kerry smear? Here is a link to the story you cut &
pasted. I see *no* mention of the Clintons.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004071781,00.html

My boat is fine. Spring will be here soon.

BTW, just because *you* can't see past the trees doesn't mean that others
can't, or that there's nothing there.

Look out John, your ABOUT TO RUN INTO A TREEE!!!......KLUNK!

So much for looking past the trees.

I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than
getting her the presidency.

Bush is toast.

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"thunder" wrote in message

"Clintons" continue Kerry smear? Here is a link to the story you cut
&
pasted. I see *no* mention of the Clintons.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004071781,00.html

My boat is fine. Spring will be here soon.

BTW, just because *you* can't see past the trees doesn't mean that
others
can't, or that there's nothing there.

Look out John, your ABOUT TO RUN INTO A TREEE!!!......KLUNK!

So much for looking past the trees.

I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than
getting her the presidency.

Bush is toast.

Clinton's worse nightmare is Kerry! If Bush is out, they lose control of
the Democratic party machine. The Democrat President gets to appoint the
party chair, and you think that they want their man out when they are
scheming on getting Hillary nominated in 2008?

In article . net,
says...

"jps" wrote in message

Bush is toast.

Clinton's worse nightmare is Kerry! If Bush is out, they lose control of
the Democratic party machine. The Democrat President gets to appoint the
party chair, and you think that they want their man out when they are
scheming on getting Hillary nominated in 2008?

I think you're getting your Republican propaganda on Kerry confused with
the Republican propaganda about Dean.

Dean is the one who wants to wrest control of the Democratic party from
the status quo. Kerry is part of that establishment.

I don't think the Clintons are as selfish as you assume.

jps

Calif Bill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

"thunder" wrote in message

"Clintons" continue Kerry smear? Here is a link to the story you cut

&

pasted. I see *no* mention of the Clintons.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004071781,00.html

My boat is fine. Spring will be here soon.

BTW, just because *you* can't see past the trees doesn't mean that

others

can't, or that there's nothing there.

Look out John, your ABOUT TO RUN INTO A TREEE!!!......KLUNK!

So much for looking past the trees.

I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than
getting her the presidency.

Bush is toast.


Clinton's worse nightmare is Kerry! If Bush is out, they lose control of
the Democratic party machine. The Democrat President gets to appoint the
party chair, and you think that they want their man out when they are
scheming on getting Hillary nominated in 2008?


You need to smoke a better brand of dope.

"jps" wrote in message

I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than
getting her the presidency.

I truly, surely, sincerely hope that the preponderance of democrats are as
blind as you!

John Gaquin wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than
getting her the presidency.


I truly, surely, sincerely hope that the preponderance of democrats are as
blind as you!




Gotta love it...the reichwingers are just beginning to get really
nervous that their dumb boy in the White House is going to lose his
fall. How delightful.

As for Hillary, I'd vote for her, but I don't see her as the nominee.
She sure scares the crap out of Republicans, though, and for that she
deserves allocades.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John Gaquin wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than
getting her the presidency.


I truly, surely, sincerely hope that the preponderance of democrats are
as
blind as you!




Gotta love it...the reichwingers are just beginning to get really
nervous that their dumb boy in the White House is going to lose his
fall. How delightful.

As for Hillary, I'd vote for her, but I don't see her as the nominee.
She sure scares the crap out of Republicans, though, and for that she
deserves allocades.


Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely nothing
presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she
accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers?

"Calif Bill" wrote in message link.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John Gaquin wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than
getting her the presidency.


I truly, surely, sincerely hope that the preponderance of democrats are
as
blind as you!




Gotta love it...the reichwingers are just beginning to get really
nervous that their dumb boy in the White House is going to lose his
fall. How delightful.

As for Hillary, I'd vote for her, but I don't see her as the nominee.
She sure scares the crap out of Republicans, though, and for that she
deserves allocades.


Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely nothing
presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she
accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers?

She's getting very high marks in her state of NY.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
link.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John Gaquin wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office
than
getting her the presidency.


I truly, surely, sincerely hope that the preponderance of democrats
are
as
blind as you!




Gotta love it...the reichwingers are just beginning to get really
nervous that their dumb boy in the White House is going to lose his
fall. How delightful.

As for Hillary, I'd vote for her, but I don't see her as the nominee.
She sure scares the crap out of Republicans, though, and for that she
deserves allocades.


Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely
nothing
presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she
accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers?

She's getting very high marks in her state of NY.

Not from all the people!
http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/GV0401.pdf

First time her approval rating has been over 50%.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message news:1nYYb.9850
Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely
nothing
presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she
accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers?

She's getting very high marks in her state of NY.

Not from all the people!
http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/GV0401.pdf

First time her approval rating has been over 50%.

Please, Bill, will you LEARN to comprehend what you read? Where to
HELL did I say ALL PEOPLE?? You should know, that for a politician to
get 50% approval rating is VERY good.