Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:32:03 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:49:37 GMT, "Peter Aitken" wrote: Also what about noise? It seems that having 2 turbocharged diesels right under you would be a lot noisier than having a couple of 4 strokes hanging off the transom. That is true with regard to noise. The only really compelling reason to go diesel is fuel range as far as I'm concerned. For the same tankage you will be able to go about twice as far. I'd also tend to agree that the ride would be somewhat better with the weight in the middle but the advantage of that is hard to quantify. As others have mentioned, the outboards will be faster and probably easier/cheaper to maintain. Diesels probably have the edge on longevity and resale value. The argument between 2 stroke and 4 stroke outboards usually takes on a religious tone but there is no question that the 2 strokes are lighter. Not to mention better, more efficient and, because I own them, perfect in every way. :) Later, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
QUESTION: Outboard vs. Inboard in a Saltwater environment (Vancouver area) | General | |||
Outboard vs. Inboard | General | |||
Inboard vs Outboard | Cruising | |||
Evinrude FICHT beats out Yamaha in JD Powers survey | General | |||
I/O OR OUTBOARD - WHAT'S BEST?? | General |