Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 31-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote: , I don't believe it. What you believe is irrelevant. We are concerned with the facts. Your believes have already been shown to be mostly fictional. Private insurance is not allowed for "medically necessary" care. Where does it say that? And IF a "medically necessary service" is insured, then access to that service is directly controlled by the government. It is rationed and priority lists are created and people are not allowed to "jump the queue" to get better or faster care. You make this up and we are supposed to believe it? Where does it say anything of the sort? THEY are the ONLY civilians who CAN seek better, faster private treatment at their own expense. Of course, No - they get treatment through different clinics, not at their expense. Stop making this stuff up. Good thing the US doesn't recognize extraterritoriality Though the yanks expect their laws to be applied extraterritorially. As it is, it's ambiguous how the Canada Health system pays for care in the US. Not at all. It's well defined. feds have to "consult and agree" with the provinces, but push comes to shove, the feds can shove the plan down the province's throat by withholding required funds and imposing penalties. The latter is your fantasy. All things where federal and provincial governments are required to work together require both levels to consult and agree. That's why federal-provincial conferences are regularly held (Unlike the US, where states do not have enough power to require the feds to negotiate on a regular basis). There are ten provinces, three territories and only one federal gocvernment. When push comes to shove, the feds are outnumbered. Constitutional changes in the early 80's were wiped out by one province - that's power. I imagine even more force would be used if a recalcitrant province still refused. You imagine a lot of things. We've come to ignore most of them. Thus, the FEDERAL government (in the person of the Governor in Council) can define what is covered and what is not and who gets it. Yet the coverage is defined, and changed, by the provinces. Funny how reality doesn't follow your fantasies. [...lots or ranting elided...] If the government were really interested in people, they would be happy to take on the more complicated, costly cases that private enterprise doesn't want to deal with. No, dickhead. If the easy stuff is done by second tier medical clinics, then only the _expensive_ and _less_common_ procedures are left for government. This means that the taxpayer foots the bill _only_ for the minority of worst case care situations. If the private clinics are so much more efficient, they should be able to handle the tough stuff. They won;t since they are only interested in a quick buck. Private clinics do exist already. They keep costs down by hiring poorly trained staff and providing inferior service for routine procedures. The threat of private enterprise is so scary that the provinces have been bullied into regulating private clinics so that they can't even opt out of the system and provide service strictly to those who are willing and able to pay. And yet the private clinics exist and provide services that one can buy. My example of a friend that payed for cataract surgery rather than wait for her hospital shows that. Thus, the government SETS THE PRIORITY LIST by dictating what is covered and what is not, What is covered is not the same as a priority list, dickhead. That's undeniably government priority setting and list making. Relax dickhead. That's an example of a region not being able to provide an adequate level of service. This is mostly bull****. It didn't just eliminate over-billing, which would have been fine, what it actually did was utterly eliminate the ability of a patient to pay for BETTER care if they can afford it, while still providing ADEQUATE care for everyone. There is no correlation between extra billing and better service or treatment. Extra billing is just a way for a doctor to inflate his earnings. YOU CANNOT GET BETTER, FASTER MEDICAL CARE IN CANADA FOR "MEDICALLY NECESSARY" TREATMENTS NO MATTER WHAT, NO MATTER HOW MUCH MONEY YOU HAVE, NO MATTER WHETHER OR NOT A PRIVATE PHYSICIAN IS WILLING TO GO THE EXTRA MILE FOR YOU! Take a pill, dickhead - you'll bust a blood vessel. There is no correlation between how much a doctor wants to charge and the quality of health care. "Better" is entirely bogus in the above rant. Faster is debatable. Their compensation is strictly limited to what the government feels is "reasonable," and they can't set up a private practice to make more, They make as much as they care to according to how many patients they see. Doctors are allowed to set up private clinics and can take profits out of the clinic for all work that is paid that does not directly involve their services. They can also make money from clinical services that are not medically necessary. Doctors remain in the highest income earning bracket in Canada. the only people who can get better care by paying for it are tourists, Since when should we provide free health care for tourists? There it is, folks, the proof positive that Canada centrally controls and rations health care. Not much proof. Lots of ranting though. Mike |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Bush propaganda against Kerry | General | |||
Bush fiddles while health care burns | General | |||
OT- Ode to Immigration | General | |||
OT-Think government-controlled health coverage will work? Think again! | General |