Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Usenet persona calling itself Paul Skoczylas wrote:
"Scott Weiser" wrote in message ... A Usenet persona calling itself Paul Skoczylas wrote: Well, I believe the RCMP does also enforce federal and province laws in the vast largely uninhabited areas of Canada, including Indian reservations. In all provinces other than Ontario and Quebec, that would be correct. ON and QC have their own police forces which enforce the laws in the remote parts of their territories. None of the other provinces have chosen to form their own police forces, though they do have the authority to do so. Many Indian reservations have their own police forces. Those that don't would hire the RCMP in most provinces, or the provincial police in ON and QC. It says on the RCMP website: "We provide a total federal policing service to all Canadians and policing services under contract to the three territories, eight provinces, approximately 198 municipalities and, under 172 individual agreements, to 192 First Nations communities." Note that it specifically says "under contract" for provinces, territories and municpalities, and "under...agreements" for the reservations. Contracts and agreements can be terminated. I think the important part is the "total federal policing services." This indicates that they retain federal powers everywhere, no matter what, and may choose, or not choose, to provide local and municipal enforcement. So tell me, does the RCMP have jurisdiction to take control of a major case in the event the locals aren't (or can't) handle it? My understanding is that they would NOT have such jurisdiction in the vast majority of cases. There would be likely be some exceptions (I believe smuggling across international borders is RCMP's exclusive jurisdiction, for example). Enforcing the national criminal code (including murder, kidnapping, etc) is the exclusive responsibility of the provinces. I don't think so, based on your quote above. Clearly the national criminal code is a federal matter, and thus the RCMP has jurisdiction to enforce it wherever it chooses. That's always been my understanding of the role of the RCMP. Note that municipalities exist at the pleasure of the provinces (not the feds), and are not enshrined in the constitution, so the *provincial* solicitor general would have the authority to grant jurisdiction in any specific case to a different police force (which could be the RCMP, or the provincial force where there is one, or it could be a force from a neighbouring municipality) if he/she feels a municpal police force was not up to the task for that case. The RCMP does not have the authority to make that decision themselves. I would guess that only applies to provincial or local laws, not national (federal) laws. Moreover, I suspect that in those areas where the locals do not have local cops, the RCMP maintains jurisdiction to enforce, at the very least, federal and province laws. Where there is no local force, the provincial force prevails. Outside ON and QC, that means the RCMP, but at the pleasure of the provinces, which do have the authority to form their own forces if they wanted to. But I still say that the RCMP retains its authority in *all* provinces to enforce federal laws, and that it has jurisdictional superiority over provincial and local law enforcement in that sphere. -- Regards, Scott Weiser "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM © 2005 Scott Weiser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Bush propaganda against Kerry | General | |||
Bush fiddles while health care burns | General | |||
OT- Ode to Immigration | General | |||
OT-Think government-controlled health coverage will work? Think again! | General |