| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
John H wrote: On 17 Mar 2005 10:35:09 -0800, wrote: John H wrote: On 17 Mar 2005 09:14:16 -0800, wrote: John H wrote: On 17 Mar 2005 06:33:37 -0800, wrote: John H wrote: On 16 Mar 2005 12:19:18 -0800, wrote: John H wrote: On 16 Mar 2005 10:32:52 -0800, wrote: John H wrote: On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote: John H wrote: I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food. Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons they're killed, i.e., their pelts and their penises! -- John H Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope. Try harder. -- Well, then, John, do tell! I've asked you to be explicit. What would make you think that I'd "get violently upset" about seals being killed for "their pelts and their penises". You have shown no evidence of trying harder. -- John H As suspected from you. John, may I suggest that if you don't know what you are talking about, then don't say anything? You had no idea about whether I would "get violently upset" about anything. And having no idea, is, by definition, ignorant. You *seem* a little upset. -- John H ANOTHER ignorant statement. Please show how you came to such a conclusion. Remember, now, we're talking about seals here, not your inability to realize that you don't know what you are talking about, when making statements about me. Where did I ever say anything that would make you think that I'd get either "violently upset" over taking seals for their body parts, or, that I "seem to be a little upset" over taking seals for their body parts? Does it not upset you that "pelts and penises" are the primary reasons for killing the little buggers? -- John H Hmm, so, you aren't going to answer my above questions, huh? By the way, by now ASKING if it upsets me, proves that by definition, your posts about me being violently upset, as well as the one that I "seem to be a little upset", were posted in ignorance. Thank you for helping make my point! You're welcome! Goodness, that's the nicest thing you've said all day! -- John H Great, at least you've thereby agreed that you were posting in pure ignorance! Pure ignorance? Yes, see number 7 below. 1=2EHaving a homogeneous or uniform composition; not mixed: pure oxygen. 2=2EFree from adulterants or impurities: pure chocolate. 3=2EFree of dirt, defilement, or pollution: "A memory without blot or contamination must be... an inexhaustible source of pure refreshment" (Charlotte Bront=EB). 5=2EFree of foreign elements. 6=2EContaining nothing inappropriate or extraneous: a pure literary style. 7=2EComplete; utter: pure folly. 8=2EHaving no faults; sinless: "I felt pure and sweet as a new baby" (Sylvia Plath). What is impure ignorance? Moot point. Do you think that because there is a pure ignorance, that there must be an IMPURE ignorance? Sheesh....... Were you not upset by the pelt and penis collecting? -- John, let's back up. Why are you now asking IF I was "upset by the pelt and penis collecting"? Before you made a statement that I MUST get upset about it. Which IS it, John? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Waterfront home for sale - Northeastern Wisconsin (Shawano, WI) | ASA | |||
| Waterfront home for sale - NE Wisconsin (Shawano) | Touring | |||
| Red Swastikas, Hate Messages Painted On Deland Home | ASA | |||
| GRETTIR'S SAGA (continued) | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
