On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:31:25 -0500, DSK wrote:

NOYB wrote:
So Hizbollah supports Syrian occupation of Lebanon? Once again...no big
surprise.

Syria and Iran are the last two countries in the Middle East whose
governments *openly* support international terrorist groups. The time to
deal with them is now.


The time to deal with Iran was before we ran up a huge debt and
overburdened the Army trying to "deal with" Iraq. And up until last
week, Syria has been very friendly and cooperative towards the Bush
Administration and vice-versa. Sort of like the way we keep cozying up
to Pakistan, which keeps it's own stable of terrorists at the ready.

So now you're agreeing that Bush's attempts to fight a "war on terror"
has largely been ineffective?

DSK

Again, Doug, it ain't over 'til it's over.

You are correct in your statement that we should have dealt with Iraq many years
ago.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
Again, Doug, it ain't over 'til it's over.


Unless somebody blows up the whole world, it ain't over even then.

You are correct in your statement that we should have dealt with Iraq many years
ago.


Bush Sr *did* but he didn't finish the job. IMHO he was hoping to do
more business with Saddam.

DSK

On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:50:17 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
Again, Doug, it ain't over 'til it's over.


Unless somebody blows up the whole world, it ain't over even then.

You are correct in your statement that we should have dealt with Iraq many years
ago.


Bush Sr *did* but he didn't finish the job. IMHO he was hoping to do
more business with Saddam.

DSK

Humble opinions are something we all have.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."