Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Bert Robbins
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Calif Bill wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


NOYB wrote:


"DSK" wrote in message
.net...



NOYB wrote:



I'd happily forgo my Social Security check later in life as long as
I

am


exempt from paying FICA today.


Same here, and I'm a lot closer to collecting than you are. If Bush &
Cheney were seriously interested in reforming or fixing Social
Security
(instead of their plan being a subterfuge to harvest campaign
contributions from Wall St), they'd offer that option.



They can't. That's the fundamental flaw of the system. We're not

putting


money away for our retirement. We're paying for the retirement of
those

who


are now retired.




Those who are now retired made it possible for you.



No, we have a "Trust Fund" of money. It is a "lock box" of money.




Sorry, I'm talking here about the opportunities created for today's
generations by those those who came before.



Isn't that what every preceeding generation does for the next throught
the whole of history?



It was until recently. Social Security is part of that legacy.


Social Security is a waste of money. If we get private accounts then people
will be able to retire at an earlier age freeing up positions for the next
generation to move up.



  #2   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 18:34:57 -0500, "Bert Robbins" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Calif Bill wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


NOYB wrote:


"DSK" wrote in message
h.net...



NOYB wrote:



I'd happily forgo my Social Security check later in life as long as
I

am


exempt from paying FICA today.


Same here, and I'm a lot closer to collecting than you are. If Bush &
Cheney were seriously interested in reforming or fixing Social
Security
(instead of their plan being a subterfuge to harvest campaign
contributions from Wall St), they'd offer that option.



They can't. That's the fundamental flaw of the system. We're not

putting


money away for our retirement. We're paying for the retirement of
those

who


are now retired.




Those who are now retired made it possible for you.



No, we have a "Trust Fund" of money. It is a "lock box" of money.




Sorry, I'm talking here about the opportunities created for today's
generations by those those who came before.


Isn't that what every preceeding generation does for the next throught
the whole of history?



It was until recently. Social Security is part of that legacy.


Social Security is a waste of money. If we get private accounts then people
will be able to retire at an earlier age freeing up positions for the next
generation to move up.



And, as people will be getting a bigger check, they'll be paying more taxes.
Seems like the liberals would *love* that idea!


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT-Not just about WMDs NOYB General 8 July 15th 04 12:26 PM
Canada has WMD's, Bush: Attack Soon! Norbert Poser General 7 February 5th 04 07:34 AM
Bush Kills Italians Bobsprit ASA 0 November 13th 03 12:48 PM
WMDs Horvath ASA 2 August 1st 03 11:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017