Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hell I glad I was not their I would shoot so many hole in the dam thing
you
would know it was a car. I think they needed to take her out and a few
more
with her. Oh and some of the CNN reporters also.



You da man, eh?



The only good communist is a dead communist. This goes for socialists

too!



I suppose you really believe that.

If you do, why are you not speaking out against Wal-Mart, which
transfers more than $100 billion a hear in hard currency to the PRC and
thereby directly supports the largest and most dangerous communist
government on earth?


Yea and I bet you shop at wal-mart too ...


  #12   Report Post  
Bert Robbins
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Bert Robbins wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Bill wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...



White House Denies It Fired Upon Italian Journalist

Politics: 7 March 2005, Monday.

The White House denied charges that US military forces may have
deliberately targeted the car carrying former Italian hostage
Giuliana
Sgrena after she was freed.


Hell I glad I was not their I would shoot so many hole in the dam
thing you
would know it was a car. I think they needed to take her out and a few
more
with her. Oh and some of the CNN reporters also.



You da man, eh?


The only good communist is a dead communist. This goes for socialists
too!

I suppose you really believe that.



Yes, I do believe it! Communism is a very bad form of government which
has been proven time and time again in this world.


If you do, why are you not speaking out against Wal-Mart, which transfers
more than $100 billion a hear in hard currency to the PRC and thereby
directly supports the largest and most dangerous communist government on
earth?



The ChiCom's are communist in name only, in reality they are an
Oligarchy.



Political systems are not binary, Bert.


The shades of gray argument again.

Didn't I read in the Washington Post this morning that your friends at the
AFL-CIO have decided, or was it Sweeney only, that money recruiting new
union members would be better spent on buying political influence? The
AFL-CIO's logic is faulty or realistic, they may know they are dying. The
AARP has it right, increase the membership of your organization and then
state that the membership will vote one way or the other to influence
elections.

Still, a good commie is a dead commie!


  #14   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
White House Denies It Fired Upon Italian Journalist

Politics: 7 March 2005, Monday.

The White House denied charges that US military forces may have
deliberately targeted the car carrying former Italian hostage Giuliana
Sgrena after she was freed.

An Italian intelligence officer in the car was shot and killed in the
incident.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan said it was "absurd" for a
former hostage in Iraq to throw such charges and noted that the car was
traveling on one of the most dangerous roads in Iraq when it was fired
upon.
- - -

Maybe the troops thought the car was full of those WMDs the White House
claimed were in Iraq?


Why? Did the trip originate in the Bekaa Valley of Lebanon?


  #15   Report Post  
P.Fritz
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John H" wrote in message
...
On 7 Mar 2005 19:23:05 -0800, wrote:

Bert wrote:

The only good communist is a dead communist. This goes for socialists
too!

***********
Careful.

Without communists, you wouldn't have the earliest decades of the
Christian church. Without the earliest decades, what would you have
today?

Without socialists, you wouldn't have the Pledge of Allegiance. (pledge
was written by a socialist)

Now what would you righties do all day if you couldn't yak on about the
US being a "Christian nation" or repeat the Pledge of Allegiance like a
rosary?

Without socialism, you wouldn't have social security. Nobody drawing a
government SS benefit has the moral right to complain about socialism,
unless they send their monthly socialist proceeds back to the treasury.
I have a mental image of you as well up into your senior years. If I'm
correct, have you sent your socialist proceeds back yet?


Do lefties not say the Pledge? This is a new concept for me - that saying
the
Pledge is a 'righties' thing.


Classic liebral think.....Nobody has a moral right to complain about
socialism because of SS. I think chuck is competing for the crown of
"King"
Accepting the guvmint check returning the money that has essentially been
stolen from you every year of your working life....more or less at gun
point.......does NOT negate the complaint against socialism.......AND
'proceeds'...........a 2% return on the stolen money....and chuck wants to
call it proceeds? He is really giving the current "king" a run for his
money.



John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."





  #16   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Do lefties not say the Pledge? This is a new concept for me - that
saying the
Pledge is a 'righties' thing.

************

Lefties say it when appropriate, and mean it.
The difference is that most on the left don't view the POA as a
stalking horse to try to get everybody in the country to acknowledge
God. Nor do we "repeat it endlessly, like a rosary".

  #17   Report Post  
Don White
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

elections.

Still, a good commie is a dead commie!



Bert...most of us have left the 50's far behind. We don't mind a little '50s
rock & roll on occasion...but that's it!


  #18   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Fits wrote:

Accepting the guvmint check returning the money that has essentially
been
stolen from you every year of your working life....more or less at gun
point.......does NOT negate the complaint against socialism.......AND
'proceeds'...........a 2% return on the stolen money....and chuck wants
to
call it proceeds? He is really giving the current "king" a run for
his
money.

***************

Today's standard: "Socialism is OK when it directly benefits me. I will
justify my suck on the government teat by pointing out that I was
forced, through taxation, to contribute to the government
during my working years and that because I am special I now deserve to
get my money back. Socialism in not OK when it benefits somebody else.
The only good Socialist is a dead socialist, but hands off the
socialist who signs the monthly check for my little piece of the
socialist security system, please."

  #19   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Fits wrote:
Accepting the guvmint check returning the money that has essentially
been
stolen from you every year of your working life....more or less at gun
point.......does NOT negate the complaint against socialism.......


Sure it does.

Accepting a Social Security benefits check... which is socialism...
while complaining about socialism, especially saying that socialists
ought to be killed... is just outright hypocrisy.

Hey Bert Robo-tard, if you want to kill a Socialist maybe you should
start with P.Fritz?

... AND
'proceeds'...........a 2% return on the stolen money....and chuck wants
to
call it proceeds?


You're right, it's not "proceeds", it's money taken from those that are
currently working. You are confusing Social Security with an investment
plan.


wrote:
Today's standard: "Socialism is OK when it directly benefits me. I will
justify my suck on the government teat by pointing out that I was
forced, through taxation, to contribute to the government
during my working years and that because I am special I now deserve to
get my money back. Socialism in not OK when it benefits somebody else.
The only good Socialist is a dead socialist, but hands off the
socialist who signs the monthly check for my little piece of the
socialist security system, please."


Too many words, Chuck.

DSK

  #20   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
Fits wrote:
Accepting the guvmint check returning the money that has essentially
been
stolen from you every year of your working life....more or less at gun
point.......does NOT negate the complaint against socialism.......


Sure it does.

Accepting a Social Security benefits check... which is socialism... while
complaining about socialism, especially saying that socialists ought to be
killed... is just outright hypocrisy.


I'd happily forgo my Social Security check later in life as long as I am
exempt from paying FICA today.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT-Not just about WMDs NOYB General 8 July 15th 04 12:26 PM
Canada has WMD's, Bush: Attack Soon! Norbert Poser General 7 February 5th 04 07:34 AM
Bush Kills Italians Bobsprit ASA 0 November 13th 03 12:48 PM
WMDs Horvath ASA 2 August 1st 03 11:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017