Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Calif Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Default High Court Nixes Death Penalty for Minors under 18


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the Constitution
forbids the execution of killers who were under 18 when they committed
their crimes, ending a practice used in 19 states.

The 5-4 decision throws out the death sentences of about 70 juvenile
murderers and bars states from seeking to execute minors for future

crimes.

The executions, the court said, were unconstitutionally cruel.

It was the second major defeat at the high court in three years for
supporters of the death penalty. Justices in 2002 banned the execution
of the mentally retarded, also citing the Constitution's Eighth
Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishments.

The court had already outlawed executions for those who were 15 and
younger when they committed their crimes.

Tuesday's ruling prevents states from making 16- and 17-year-olds
eligible for execution.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, cited the fact that
most states don't allow the execution of juvenile killers and those that
do use the penalty infrequently. The trend, he noted, was to abolish the
practice.

"Our society views juveniles ... as categorically less culpable than the
average criminal," Kennedy wrote.


And if they ban the requirement that a minor gets out at 21 for most violent
crimes, they will be doing good.


  #2   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Harry Krause wrote:
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the

Constitution
forbids the execution of killers who were under 18 when they

committed
their crimes, ending a practice used in 19 states.

The 5-4 decision throws out the death sentences of about 70 juvenile
murderers and bars states from seeking to execute minors for future

crimes.

The executions, the court said, were unconstitutionally cruel.

It was the second major defeat at the high court in three years for
supporters of the death penalty. Justices in 2002 banned the

execution
of the mentally retarded, also citing the Constitution's Eighth
Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishments.

The court had already outlawed executions for those who were 15 and
younger when they committed their crimes.

Tuesday's ruling prevents states from making 16- and 17-year-olds
eligible for execution.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, cited the fact

that
most states don't allow the execution of juvenile killers and those

that
do use the penalty infrequently. The trend, he noted, was to abolish

the
practice.

"Our society views juveniles ... as categorically less culpable than

the
average criminal," Kennedy wrote.


I don't know about this. If you look at the statistics of inner cities,
you'll see that an alarming rate of murders and habitual crimes are
perpetrated by persons under 18. Now, I'm not necessarily for the death
penalty, but, I do think that these thugs should be treated just like
someone who did the same crimes and was OVER 18.

  #3   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 19:46:33 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the Constitution
forbids the execution of killers who were under 18 when they committed
their crimes, ending a practice used in 19 states.

The 5-4 decision throws out the death sentences of about 70 juvenile
murderers and bars states from seeking to execute minors for future

crimes.

The executions, the court said, were unconstitutionally cruel.

It was the second major defeat at the high court in three years for
supporters of the death penalty. Justices in 2002 banned the execution
of the mentally retarded, also citing the Constitution's Eighth
Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishments.

The court had already outlawed executions for those who were 15 and
younger when they committed their crimes.

Tuesday's ruling prevents states from making 16- and 17-year-olds
eligible for execution.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, cited the fact that
most states don't allow the execution of juvenile killers and those that
do use the penalty infrequently. The trend, he noted, was to abolish the
practice.

"Our society views juveniles ... as categorically less culpable than the
average criminal," Kennedy wrote.


And if they ban the requirement that a minor gets out at 21 for most violent
crimes, they will be doing good.


They'd change their minds if they spent a couple weeks in an 8th grade
classroom!


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bill Moyers on environment, politics and Christian fundamentalists [email protected] General 1852 April 5th 05 11:17 PM
41 + 1 Michael ASA 16 January 12th 05 10:59 PM
Neal Warren comments about racial issues JG ASA 25 December 20th 04 10:58 PM
Bush Resume Bobsprit ASA 21 September 14th 03 11:22 PM
Just How Safe Do You Feel? Doug Kanter General 34 July 13th 03 06:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017