"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 19:46:33 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the
Constitution
forbids the execution of killers who were under 18 when they committed
their crimes, ending a practice used in 19 states.

The 5-4 decision throws out the death sentences of about 70 juvenile
murderers and bars states from seeking to execute minors for future

crimes.

The executions, the court said, were unconstitutionally cruel.

It was the second major defeat at the high court in three years for
supporters of the death penalty. Justices in 2002 banned the execution
of the mentally retarded, also citing the Constitution's Eighth
Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishments.

The court had already outlawed executions for those who were 15 and
younger when they committed their crimes.

Tuesday's ruling prevents states from making 16- and 17-year-olds
eligible for execution.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, cited the fact that
most states don't allow the execution of juvenile killers and those
that
do use the penalty infrequently. The trend, he noted, was to abolish
the
practice.

"Our society views juveniles ... as categorically less culpable than
the
average criminal," Kennedy wrote.

And if they ban the requirement that a minor gets out at 21 for most
violent
crimes, they will be doing good.



They'd change their minds if they spent a couple weeks in an 8th grade
classroom!


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."


If you were a competent substitute teacher, you'd think otherwise.

If you were a competent, that would be amazing.