http://www.kuwaitifreedom.org/home.php

http://www.september11news.com/

So, September 11 was the day we gave up on freedom, American
principles, and due process?

Otherwise I don't get your reply, at all.

How many of the 9-11 criminals were from Kuwait? (answer: ZERO) But
one brown skinned raghead is the same as the next, right?

wrote in message
oups.com...
So, September 11 was the day we gave up on freedom, American
principles, and due process?

Otherwise I don't get your reply, at all.

How many of the 9-11 criminals were from Kuwait? (answer: ZERO) But
one brown skinned raghead is the same as the next, right?


Many times, yes.

So, eleven Kuwaitis remain in captivity.

Otherwise I don't get your reply, at all.

How many of the Kuwaitis had anything to do with WMD in Lebanon? (Answer ZERO,
but a ridiculous response is better than an acknowledgement that something good
occurred, right?)

Do you get my drift?

You keep missing the big picture, John.

We embark on a crusade that makes a mockery of everything this country
traditionally has stood for, imprison people without due process,
follow our own citiznes around peering and prying into library reading
lists, etc.....and you continue to declare every day with fewer than
the prevailing average number of innocent people killed as "good news".

Good news will be when we get serious about dismembering the
organization that already attacked us, not when we continue down some
unrelated list of people and nations who just might maybe, somehow,
some way, someday, attack us in the future. (Taken to its logical
extreme, that includes everybody).

Give me liberty or give me death? For too many folks that has become
"Forget about liberty. Give me an absolute assurance my family won't be
attacked by a terrorist and I'll volunteer to set fire to the Bill of
Rights"

"People who are willing to trade liberty for security deserve neither."

wrote in message
oups.com...
You keep missing the big picture, John.

We embark on a crusade that makes a mockery of everything this country
traditionally has stood for, imprison people without due process,
follow our own citiznes around peering and prying into library reading
lists, etc.....and you continue to declare every day with fewer than
the prevailing average number of innocent people killed as "good news".

Good news will be when we get serious about dismembering the
organization that already attacked us,

You first need to dismember the governments of the countries that are
supporting them.

not when we continue down some
unrelated list of people and nations who just might maybe, somehow,
some way, someday, attack us in the future. (Taken to its logical
extreme, that includes everybody).

The large majority in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Egypt, etc. are happy that
they're being given the chance to vote in democratic elections. I'm sure
the same is true for folks in Iran and Syria. And we can thank Bush's
policies for giving them that chance.

The chance to choose their leaders fills them with hope rather than
despair...which is good, because despair is what breeds terrorism.




Give me liberty or give me death? For too many folks that has become
"Forget about liberty. Give me an absolute assurance my family won't be
attacked by a terrorist and I'll volunteer to set fire to the Bill of
Rights"

Sign me up.



"People who are willing to trade liberty for security deserve neither."

OK Mr. Franklin. The problem with that statement is that the US has a
history of trading liberty for security in times of war.

Good news will be when we get serious about dismembering the
organization that already attacked us,


NOYB wrote:
You first need to dismember the governments of the countries that are
supporting them.

Agreed, definitely.

So why did we attack Iraq?

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
news
Good news will be when we get serious about dismembering the
organization that already attacked us,


NOYB wrote:
You first need to dismember the governments of the countries that are
supporting them.

Agreed, definitely.

So why did we attack Iraq?


You missed the part where Saddam was paying the families of suicide bombers,
and was harboring known terrorists (like Abu Nidal) in Baghdad?

So why did we attack Iraq?



NOYB wrote:
You missed the part where Saddam was paying the families of suicide bombers,
and was harboring known terrorists (like Abu Nidal) in Baghdad?


So, we invaded Iraq because they harbored an anti-European terrorist
about 20 years ago, and Saddam *claimed* (not verified) that he was
supporting anti-Israeli terrorists?

DSK