(snip)
As a true conservative, I am diametrically opposed to forcing
"fingerprinting" or other such nonsense on the law-abiding public.

swatcop wrote:
Ah-ha! See! You've made my point for me as well! We're not talking about the
PUBLIC. We're talking about government employees

wrong. We are (or at least, we were last time I looked) talking about
volunteers.


who have access to
classified information! If I was John Q. Public, I wouldn't want to be
fingerprinted for no good reason either.

AHA! See? Now maybe you "get" the reason why so many of the volunteers said,
"Thanks but no thanks, bye."

But, if I (John Q. Public) was
employed by the federal governmant that required me to be fingerprinted, I'd
either follow the rules or find another job. Thank you for inadvertantly
proving my point AGAIN.
--
-= swatcop =-

"If it wasn't for stupid people I'd be unemployed."

You're employed by a place that deliberately hires stupid people? In law
enforcement? What are you, the bait?

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
...
(snip)
As a true conservative, I am diametrically opposed to forcing
"fingerprinting" or other such nonsense on the law-abiding public.

swatcop wrote:
Ah-ha! See! You've made my point for me as well! We're not talking about
the
PUBLIC. We're talking about government employees

wrong. We are (or at least, we were last time I looked) talking about
volunteers.

Well, you better look again. Volunteers, yes. But what KIND of volunteers.
United States Coast Guard volunteers, maybe? Ring a bell? Ding ding ding
ding!



who have access to
classified information! If I was John Q. Public, I wouldn't want to be
fingerprinted for no good reason either.

AHA! See? Now maybe you "get" the reason why so many of the volunteers
said,
"Thanks but no thanks, bye."

Good. Then they shouldn't be there. Employ someone who is able to follow the
rules and comply with the screening process.


But, if I (John Q. Public) was
employed by the federal governmant that required me to be fingerprinted,
I'd
either follow the rules or find another job. Thank you for inadvertantly
proving my point AGAIN.
--
-= swatcop =-

"If it wasn't for stupid people I'd be unemployed."

You're employed by a place that deliberately hires stupid people? In law
enforcement? What are you, the bait?

Um, NO. You misinterprated what it means. If it wasn't for stupid people
(quite like yourself), then I'd be unemployed (due to the lack of need for
law enforcement because if there were no stupid people there would be less
crime).

--
-= swatcop =-

"If it wasn't for stupid people I'd be unemployed."

AHA! See? Now maybe you "get" the reason why so many of the volunteers
said,
"Thanks but no thanks, bye."

swatcop wrote:
Good. Then they shouldn't be there. Employ someone who is able to follow the
rules and comply with the screening process.

There you go... 'employ'

Thanks for spending more of our tax money, so that you can be a bullying asshole
with your subordinates as well as any average citizen that has the bad luck to
catch your eye.


... if there were no stupid people there would be less
crime).

But there would still be small souled men who enjoy putting down others when
they can get away with it, and of course they gravitate to any job where they
can indulge in that. Look in a mirror, you'll see what I mean.

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
...
AHA! See? Now maybe you "get" the reason why so many of the volunteers
said,
"Thanks but no thanks, bye."

swatcop wrote:
Good. Then they shouldn't be there. Employ someone who is able to follow
the
rules and comply with the screening process.

There you go... 'employ'

Yes, EMPLOY. You know, "give a job to." You twist everything that I say,
don't you?


Thanks for spending more of our tax money, so that you can be a bullying
asshole
with your subordinates as well as any average citizen that has the bad
luck to
catch your eye.

Now I'm a bullying asshole because you have a problem with reading
comprehension? Um, no. Oh, and I don't spend your tax money, YOU do. And
you're not an average citizen, either. Judging from you poor reading
comprehension skills, I'd place you in the UNDER average category.



... if there were no stupid people there would be less
crime).

But there would still be small souled men who enjoy putting down others
when
they can get away with it, and of course they gravitate to any job where
they
can indulge in that. Look in a mirror, you'll see what I mean.

Yep. Just looked in the mirror. I said "mirror, mirror, on the wall - who
the dumbest one of all?" You know what it said? "That idiot who goes by the
initials DSK on the rec.boats newsgroup."

Well, it's time to say farewell, dip****. You've just earned youself a spot
on my "blocked senders" list. So live it up, post whatever you want. I'll
never get it. Take care now, bye-bye then. Oh, and I really would check into
those remedial classes if I were you.

--
-= swatcop =-

"If it wasn't for stupid people I'd be unemployed."