"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 9:12 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...


snippage...


Since I never made that claim, seems you are wrong as
usual.
=============
ROTFLMAO What a hoot! what part of...

"...I'm sure that's what the Framers had in mind...that a
crack dealer can arm
his posse with assault weapons with a trip to the gun shack
on
the corner
and spray the local park with semi-automatic (or perhaps
converted to
automatic) gunfire..." kamn 2/20/2005 1:41

...doesn't sound familier to you? Or, are you now claiming
that somebody else here is posting fraudulantly using your
name?

No look at what you said:

"You're the one that claimed that the drug dealers were
buying
assault weapons at the corner gun-mart, and that they killed
1000s of people every year"
==============
Yes, I repeated the gist of your previous spew... A spew that
is
so full of ignorance and idiocy that it only gets the derision
it
deserves.

Your "gist" include a specific claim that I did not make. Thus,
your "gist"
was an attempt to deceive that was exposed.
=====================
No, it was not. The only thing 'exposed' was you continued
ignorance on any subject you seem to reply to.





I remain confident that the Framers did not have in mind that
a
crack dealer could buy an assault weapon at the store on the
corner and spray the park with semi-automatic gunfire.
=======================
No, they didn't have that in mind, and only you belive it or
are
trying to say that that occurs. Crack dealers have no rights
to
buy arms.

Crack dealers who have not lost their rights to buy arms can
buy them. You
do realize that not every crack dealer ends up being convicted,
right? Heck,
all they have to do is go down to the corner and buy the right
weapon to
shoot any witnesses against them!
=====================
LOL Do you make this up as you go, or has your fantasies been
the main part of your life for years now?






What I did not say was that such incidents aco****ed for
1000s
of deaths each year, and thus, you are wrong to attribute
that
position.
==================
Yet you keep implying it. How many crack dealers are there,
how
many parks? Adds up to 1000s of people killed in your fantasy
world of make-believe.

I never said any such thing, nor implied it. If even one person
is killed
with an assault weapon - a gun that is designed to kill many
people quickly
- that's obviously too many.
=====================
Yes, that is exactly what you keep implying when you talk about
spraying in parks.



Oh, and I see that you are in fact capable of re-posting
information.

We are all still waiting for your repost of the evidence that
Canadians are dying in waiting lines.
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.

What was the date and time of your most recent posting of this
information?

It does not seem to be available on usenet.
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.



Anyone else see it?

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 9:00 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...



snippage..



Since the latter would be true for any system of health
care,
you've watered down your position to something that is
totally without meaning.
================================
No fool, the fact that people die waiting is hardly what I'd
call a system that is working for everyone. Again, sarcasm
is
above your level of comprehension, isn't it?

Please post a link to any evidence that Canadians are dying
in
line waiting for health care.
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.

What was the date and time that you last posted it?

It does not seem to be available.

Anyone else see it?
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article t,
rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 8:59 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...



snippage...


For some reason it is not available on usenet. Please post
again. Thanks.
=================
I have. And I've told you where else to check several times.
That you are still willfully ignorant is your decision.

What was the date and time of the most recent posting?

For some reason it is not available on usenet.

Did anyone else see it?
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.

in article et, rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 10:44 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 9:12 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...


snippage...


Since I never made that claim, seems you are wrong as
usual.
=============
ROTFLMAO What a hoot! what part of...

"...I'm sure that's what the Framers had in mind...that a
crack dealer can arm
his posse with assault weapons with a trip to the gun shack
on
the corner
and spray the local park with semi-automatic (or perhaps
converted to
automatic) gunfire..." kamn 2/20/2005 1:41

...doesn't sound familier to you? Or, are you now claiming
that somebody else here is posting fraudulantly using your
name?

No look at what you said:

"You're the one that claimed that the drug dealers were
buying
assault weapons at the corner gun-mart, and that they killed
1000s of people every year"
==============
Yes, I repeated the gist of your previous spew... A spew that
is
so full of ignorance and idiocy that it only gets the derision
it
deserves.

Your "gist" include a specific claim that I did not make. Thus,
your "gist"
was an attempt to deceive that was exposed.
=====================
No, it was not.

Whatever it was, it wasn't truthful. Because, the truth is, I never said
what you claimed I said.





I remain confident that the Framers did not have in mind that
a
crack dealer could buy an assault weapon at the store on the
corner and spray the park with semi-automatic gunfire.
=======================
No, they didn't have that in mind, and only you belive it or
are
trying to say that that occurs. Crack dealers have no rights
to
buy arms.

Crack dealers who have not lost their rights to buy arms can
buy them. You
do realize that not every crack dealer ends up being convicted,
right? Heck,
all they have to do is go down to the corner and buy the right
weapon to
shoot any witnesses against them!
=====================
LOL Do you make this up as you go, or has your fantasies been
the main part of your life for years now?

What's to stop an accused crack dealer from buying an assault rifle at the
shop on the corner and shooting a witness?

What I did not say was that such incidents aco****ed for
1000s
of deaths each year, and thus, you are wrong to attribute
that
position.
==================
Yet you keep implying it. How many crack dealers are there,
how
many parks? Adds up to 1000s of people killed in your fantasy
world of make-believe.

I never said any such thing, nor implied it. If even one person
is killed
with an assault weapon - a gun that is designed to kill many
people quickly
- that's obviously too many.
=====================
Yes, that is exactly what you keep implying when you talk about
spraying in parks.

I'm not implying anything. I'm saying it: if more than one person is killed
with an assault weapon that is one too many.

Oh, and I see that you are in fact capable of re-posting
information.

We are all still waiting for your repost of the evidence that
Canadians are dying in waiting lines.
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.

What was the date and time of your most recent posting of this
information?

It does not seem to be available on usenet.
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.



Anyone else see it?

It doesn't seem to be available. Why won't you share the date and time of
yoru most recent post with this information?

in article et, rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 10:44 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 9:00 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...



snippage..



Since the latter would be true for any system of health
care,
you've watered down your position to something that is
totally without meaning.
================================
No fool, the fact that people die waiting is hardly what I'd
call a system that is working for everyone. Again, sarcasm
is
above your level of comprehension, isn't it?

Please post a link to any evidence that Canadians are dying
in
line waiting for health care.
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.

What was the date and time that you last posted it?

It does not seem to be available.

Anyone else see it?
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.

Why can't you simply state the date and time that you most recently made
such a post?

in article et, rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 10:45 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article t,
rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 8:59 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...



snippage...


For some reason it is not available on usenet. Please post
again. Thanks.
=================
I have. And I've told you where else to check several times.
That you are still willfully ignorant is your decision.

What was the date and time of the most recent posting?

For some reason it is not available on usenet.

Did anyone else see it?
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.

Why not simply state the date and time?

KMAN wrote:
"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
om...

snip
For whatever reasons, it is not available on usenet.

Please post to rec.boats.paddle a link to a Canadian reference (or any
reference) that proves Canadians have died in wait lines for health
care, and I will make a formal and public apology.

=======================
I have.


For some reason it is not available on usenet. Please post again. Thanks.

If anyone else has seen the message, please repost. Thanks.

What message? He didn't post any link to any credible Canadian
reference, either in this thread or any other, I only saw "I have" a
couple of times.

--
Wilko van den Bergh wilko(a t)dse(d o t)nl
Eindhoven The Netherlands Europe
---Look at the possibilities, don't worry about the limitations.---
http://wilko.webzone.ru/

in article , Wilko at
wrote on 2/24/05 11:17 PM:



KMAN wrote:
"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

snip
For whatever reasons, it is not available on usenet.

Please post to rec.boats.paddle a link to a Canadian reference (or any
reference) that proves Canadians have died in wait lines for health
care, and I will make a formal and public apology.

=======================
I have.


For some reason it is not available on usenet. Please post again. Thanks.

If anyone else has seen the message, please repost. Thanks.

What message? He didn't post any link to any credible Canadian
reference, either in this thread or any other, I only saw "I have" a
couple of times.

That would be my view.

But he keeps saying he has posted it, so I am sure there is just a
misunderstanding.

Has anyone seen rick post any reference (credible or otherwise) that proves
Canadians are dying waiting in line for health care? If so, please provide a
link. Thanks.

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 10:45 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
t,
rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 8:59 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...



snippage...


For some reason it is not available on usenet. Please post
again. Thanks.
=================
I have. And I've told you where else to check several
times.
That you are still willfully ignorant is your decision.

What was the date and time of the most recent posting?

For some reason it is not available on usenet.

Did anyone else see it?
=================
I have, and I've told you where else to check several times.
that you wish to remain willfully ignorant is your decision.

Why not simply state the date and time?
====================
The posts were already made. Do your own homework, fool...

"Wilko" wrote in message
...


KMAN wrote:
"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
. com...

snip
For whatever reasons, it is not available on usenet.

Please post to rec.boats.paddle a link to a Canadian
reference (or any reference) that proves Canadians have died
in wait lines for health care, and I will make a formal and
public apology.

=======================
I have.


For some reason it is not available on usenet. Please post
again. Thanks.

If anyone else has seen the message, please repost. Thanks.

What message? He didn't post any link to any credible Canadian
reference,
================
ROTFLMAO What a hoot!! That's it, shoot the messenger when they
don't agree with you. More willful ignorance?


either in this thread or any other, I only saw "I have" a
couple of times.

--
Wilko van den Bergh wilko(a t)dse(d o
t)nl
Eindhoven The Netherlands Europe
---Look at the possibilities, don't worry about the
limitations.---
http://wilko.webzone.ru/