Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:53:06 +1100, "K. Smith"
wrote: ~~ snippage ~~ I know my view on this is against you Tom & I do apologise but as you can see I have copped an endless flogging mainly from Krause & the dealers, so when we were confirmed as right most of them just ran away leaving the people they'd conned holding the blown engine so to speak. I don't' have a problem with opposing viewpoints. I have a rather simple way of looking at things like this - to wit: If it works, it works. :) I will admit I came to FICHT late in the game and I will also admit that I literally had to be talked into purchasing one. And I will also admit that I had my share of problems with the OMC FICHT that is on my Ranger bay boat. However, Bombardier was more than willing to correct the problems without cost to me and once the engine was updated and made sound, I haven't had a problem with it. And the other two that I have, both Bombardier FICHTS have had zero problems. However, your discussion points make sense and I'm not discounting them. My experience has been positive and, for me that's is what is most important. To me, Mercury is the spawn of the devil and will remain that way until I can't get in a boat anymore. And it wasn't over their engines, it was over a $1,000 trolling motor that they refused to fix under warranty - sometimes the little things are bigger issues than the big things. :) Later, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What does MIT say about ionization and lightning?? | ASA | |||
2004 9.9 Mercury - 2 stroke or 4 stroke? | General | |||
Need a new 2-4 hp outboard - must be 2 stroke - what's available outside California | Cruising | |||
2 stroke vs. 4 stroke?? | General | |||
4 stroke produces more "thrust"???? | General |